Printed for the University of London Press, Ltd., by
Richard Clay & Sons, Ltd., London and Bungay.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Nat. Tribes, p. 157. It is hardly necessary to point out that this phrase is without a precise sense, unless it be evident in what sense the author uses the conception "social unit." One looks in vain for such a definition in Howitt.
[2] Howitt, Trans. R.S.V., l.c., p. 134.
[3] Trans. R.S.V., p. 135.
[4] Compare the passage quoted by A. Lang, just below, and the passage quoted by us, [pp. 108] sqq., and [p. 243]. How far Spencer and Gillen have the right to deny the existence of the individual family among the Urabunna will be discussed in detail below.
[5] I have quoted the best first-hand authorities; instances could easily be multiplied as well from their works as also from other sources.
[6] Trans. R.S.V., p. 115.
[7] Curr, A.R., i. p. iii.