[331] Howitt, Nat. Tr., p. 183.
[333] J.A.I., xx. p. 58.
[334] See below, [pp. 195], [238] and [243].
[335] Compare, however, the definition given by N.W. Thomas, loc. cit., p. 128, who shows also how misleading an indiscriminate use of such terms may be.
[336] And some others. For instance, Prof. Frazer in his new work, loc. cit., i. pp. 363 sqq., where the theories and views of these authorities on Pirrauru are accepted without any criticism.
[337] Loc. cit., p. 136.
[338] Nat. Tr., p. 109.
[339] Mr. Thomas has also remarked (loc. cit., p. 128) that Spencer and Gillen, who speak on page 109 of the real and not pretended group marriage among the Urabunna, say on the next page, that in the same tribe group marriage preceded the present state of things—and so contradict themselves. Such a carelessness is remarkable in a work, which in all other respects is a masterpiece; and all these reasons induce us to suspect that the subject in question must have been in theory as well as in facts not very familiar to our authors.
[340] Nor. Tr., p. 140.