2. Do the pupils give evidence of having had previous historical training in the high school? What is the basis of your conclusion?
3. Have the pupils thoroughly prepared for the day's recitation?
4. Have they apparently confined themselves to the text, or have they gone outside this for material?
5. Have they "studied the lesson together"? Do you approve of such study?
6. If pupils show they have not sought to prepare the lesson well, what procedure does the teacher follow? Do you approve?
7. Have the pupils "outlined the lesson"? Is it well that they should do so?
8. Apparently, have the pupils been shown how to study, i.e., how to prepare the work most advantageously? What was the mode of doing this?
9. Have the pupils attacked the lesson because it was made to appear vital to the solution of some really interesting problem?
10. Have the pupils really gotten behind the facts to the spirit of the movement?
11. Have the pupils apparently attempted to correlate geography with the history? What evidences have you of this?