[69] Both genealogies may easily be suspected of being later additions. If Luke’s genealogy is a gloss there is no apparent reason why it should not have been inserted in the appropriate place; cf. Sanders, Journal of Biblical Literature, XXX, 11.
[70] E.g., the verses on Peter and the keys, or on Peter walking on the water, or the conversation of Jesus with John the Baptist at the time of Jesus’ baptism.
[71] In the Hibbert Journal, No. 39, April, 1912, pp. 615-25.
[72] This passage has been already treated in a different connection on p. 39.
[73] Omitted in some manuscripts of Mark.
[74] vii, 28; xi, 1; xiii, 53; xix, 1; xxvi, 1.
[75] Hawkins, Horae Synopticae, p. 165.
[76] Wernle, p. 110.
[77] Luke uses it twenty-four times against Matthew’s seven and Mark’s four.
[78] P. 617.