SUMMARY OF CONTENTS.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| [Introduction]— | ||
| Paras. | Page. | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Object of the book | [i] |
| 2. | Early wrongs of the Moslem; justification in taking uparms, if taken | [ii] |
| 3. | Commencement of the war; the Koreish being publicenemy were liable to be treated as such | ib. |
| 4. | But the Moslems could not take up arms to redress theirwrongs under certain circumstances | [iii] |
| 5. | Moslems otherwise engaged at Medina had no intentionof suffering the horrors of war by taking the initiative,but were in imminent danger from the enemy | [iv] |
| 6. | The Koreish first attacked the Moslems at Medina. Theycould not forbear the escape of the Moslems | [v] |
| 7. | Three battles waged by the Koreish against Mohammad—Badr,Ohad, and Ahzáb: these wars on the Moslem sidewere purely in defence, not waged even to redress theirwrongs or re-establish their rights | [vii] |
| 8. | The battle of Badr was defensive on the part of Mohammad.Reasons for the same | [viii] |
| 9. | Mohammad at Medina, owing to the attacks, inroads, andthreatening gatherings of the Koreish and other tribes,had hardly time to think of offensive measures | [xi] |
| 10. | Armed opposition of the Koreish to the Moslem pilgrimsfrom Medina in the vicinity of Mecca. The truce ofHodeibia | [xv] |
| 11. | The Koreish again commit hostilities and violate theirpledge. War declared against those who had violatedthe truce. War not carried out | [xvi] |
| 12. | War with foes other than Koreish | [xviii] |
| 13. | Expedition to Tabúk to check the advancing enemy. Nowar took place | [xix] |
| 14. | Number of the wars of Mohammad much exaggerated:Ghazava defined; number of actual wars | [xx] |
| 15. | The Revd. Mr. Green's remarks on the wars of Mohammadcriticised | [xxiii] |
| 16. | Another view of the wars of Mohammad | [xxviii] |
| 17. | Caravans if waylaid were waylaid by way of reprisal | [xxx] |
| 18. | Intolerance; no compulsory conversion enjoined or tookplace during Mohammad's lifetime: Sir W. Muir quoted and refuted | [xxxi] |
| 19. | A brief sketch of the propagation of Islam at Mecca: Islam at Mecca; Islam at Abyssinia; Conversions at Nakhla | [xxxii] |
| 20. | Rapid stride of Islam at Medina | [xxxvii] |
| 21. | The increasing number of Moslem converts at Meccaafter the Hegira | [xxxix] |
| 22. | Disturbed state of the public peace among the tribessurrounding Medina. Internicine wars, an obstacle tothe propagation of Islam | [xl] |
| 23. | Sketch of the intertribal wars in Arabia during the lifetimeof Mohammad | [xli] |
| 24. | Spread of Islam in the surrounding tribes at Medinaafter the Hegira I—VI | [xliii] |
| 25. | Mecca a barrier against the conversion of the Southerntribes | [xliv] |
| 26. | Tribal conversions in the sixth year. Conversion amongseveral other tribes of the North and North-east inA.H. VIII | [xlv] |
| 27. | Surrender of Mecca, A.H. VIII | [xlvii] |
| 28. | Mecca not compelled to believe | ib. |
| 29. | The wholesale conversion of the remaining tribes,A.H. IX and X | [xlviii] |
| 30. | The various deputations in the 9th and 10th year of theHegira | [li] |
| 31. | A list of the deputations of conversion received byMohammad at Medina during A.H. IX and X | [li]—lviii |
| 32. | All conversions, individual and tribal, were without anycompulsion | [lix] |
| 33. | Mohammad was not favoured with circumstances roundhim. The difficulty Mohammad encountered in hiswork. Marcus Dods quoted: Dr. Mohseim's causes of the spread of Islam and Hallam quoted | [lx]—lxv |
| 34. | Mohammad's unwavering belief in his own mission andhis success show him to be a true prophet. Mohammad'sefforts established monotheism in Arabia. Hismanly exertions, and his single handed perseverance.The business and office of a prophet described. Sir W.Muir and Stobart quoted | [lxv]—lxix |
| 35. | The reforms of Mohammad, his iconoclastic policy. Theredemption of Arabia from venal debauchery and infatuatedsuperstition. Muir, Marcus Dods, Stephensquoted | [lxix]—lxxvii |
| 36. | Indictment against Mohammad. His alleged cruelty andsensuality. Muir, Rev. Hughes, Marcus Dods, andStanley Poole refuted | [lxxviii]—lxxxvii |
| 37. | Objections to the (1) Finality of the social reforms ofMohammad, (2) positive precepts, (3) ceremonial law,(4) morality, (5) want of adaptability to the varyingcircumstances | [lxxxvii]—lxxxix |
| 38. | All these objections apply rather to the teaching of theMohammadan Common Law than to the Koran | [xc] |
| 39. | (1) Finality of social reforms of Mohammad discussed.Intermediary not to be considered final | [xc]—xcii |
| 40. | (2) Positive precepts and (3) ceremonial law, pilgrimage,Kibla, amount of alms, fasts, forms and attitude ofprayer, &c.: pretentious prayers and ostentatiousalmsgiving | [xcii]—xcvii |
| 41. | (4) The Koran, both abstract and concrete in morals | [xcvii]—cii |
| 42. | (5) Adaptability of the Koran to surroundingcircumstances | [cii]—ciii |
| 43. | Suitability of the Koran to all classes of humanity | [ciii]—civ |
| Note | [cv] | |
| Genealogical tables of the tribes mentioned in para. 31 ofthe Introduction | [cvi]—cvii | |
| [ALL THE WARS OF MOHAMMAD WERE DEFENSIVE.] | ||
[I.—The Persecution.] | ||
| 1. | The early persecution of Moslems by the people of Mecca | [2] |
| 2. | Notices of the persecutions in the Koran | [4] |
| 3. | Insults suffered by Mohammad | [5] |
| 4. | Historical summary of the persecutions | [8] |
| 5. | The Hegira, or the expulsion of the Moslems from Mecca | [9] |
| 6. | The persecution of the Moslems by the Koreish after theirflight from Mecca | [11] |
[II.—The Meccans or the Koreish.] | ||
| 7. | A Koreish chieftain commits a raid near Medina, A.H. 1 | ib. |
| 8. | The Koreish march to attack Medina. Battle of Badr | ib. |
| 9. | Attack by Abu Sofian upon Medina, A.H. 2 | [12] |
| 10. | Battle of Ohad | [12] |
| 11. | Mohammad's prestige affected by the defeat | ib. |
| 12. | Abu Sofian threatened the Moslems with another attack nextyear | [13] |
| 13. | The Koreish again attack Medina with a large army.Mohammad defends the city. The enemy retire. A.H. 5 | [14] |
| 14. | Mohammad with his followers advanced to perform thelesser pilgrimage of Mecca. The Koreish oppose Mohammad,who return disappointed. The treaty of Hodeibia | [15] |
| 15. | Violation of the treaty by the Koreish and their submission | [16] |
| 16. | Two other tribes assume the offensive | ib. |
[III.—The Defensive Character of the Wars.] | ||
| 17. | Verses from the Koran in support of the defensive characterof the wars | [25] |
| 18. | What the above quoted verses show | [26] |
| 19. | Justification of the Moslems in taking up arms against theiraggressors | [27] |
| 20. | The first aggression after the Hegira was not on the partof Mohammad | [28] |
| 21. | The alleged instances examined | [29] |
| 22. | Hamza and Obeida's expeditions | ib. |
| 23. | Abwa, Bowat, and Osheira expeditions | [30] |
| 24. | The affair at Nakhla | [31] |
| 25. | At Badr Mohammad came only in his defence | [33] |
| 26. | The first aggression after the Hegira if from Mohammad,might fairly be looked upon as retaliation | [34] |
[IV.—The Jews.] | ||
| 27. | The Jews broke treaties | ib. |
| 28. | Bani Kainukaa, Bani Nazeer, Khyber, and Ghatafán | [35] |
| 29. | Notice of them in Koran | [37] |
| 30. | The judgment of Sád | [38] |
| 31. | Defensive character of the expedition against the Jews ofKhyber | [40] |
[V.—The Christians or Romans.] | ||
| 32. | Tabúk, the last expedition | ib. |
| 33. | Description of the wars concluded | [41] |
[VI.—The Intolerance.] | ||
| 34. | Mohammad never taught intolerance | [43] |
| 35. | In what sense the wars were religious wars | [44] |
| 36. | The alleged verses of intolerance explained | [45] |
| 37. | Sir William Muir quoted | [47] |
| 38. | Comment on the above quotation | [50] |
| 39. | Object of Mohammad's wars | [51] |
[VII.—The Ninth Chapter or Sura Barát.] | ||
| 40. | The opening portion of the IX Sura of the Koran onlyrelates to the Koreish who had violated the truce | [55] |
[VIII.—The alleged Interceptions of the Koreish Caravans.] | ||
| 41. | The nine alleged interceptions of the Koreish caravans | [57] |
| 42. | The interceptions were impossible under the circumstancesin which Mohammad was placed | [59] |
| 43. | The interceptions, if occurred, were justified by way ofreprisal | [60] |
[IX.—The alleged Assassinations.] | ||
| 44. | Instances of the alleged assassinations cited | [61] |
| 45. | Mr. Stanley Poole quoted | [62] |
| 46. | Asma-bint Marwan | [63] |
| 47. | The story deserves not our belief | [64] |
| 48. | Abu Afak | [65] |
| 49. | Kab, son of Ashraf | [66] |
| 50. | Mohammad could never have had any share in Kab's murder | [68] |
| 51. | Sofian bin Khalid | [69] |
| 52. | Justification of Sofian's alleged murder | [70] |
| 53. | Abu Rafe | [72] |
| 54. | Oseir bin Zarim | [73] |
| 55. | The intended assassination of Abu Sofian | [74] |
| 56. | Irving and Muir quoted; concluding remarks | [76] |
[X.—The alleged Cruelties in executing Prisoners of War and others.] | ||
| 57. | Treatment of the prisoners of war | ib. |
| 58. | Law of nations regarding the prisoners of war | [77] |
| 59. | The execution of Nadher Ibn Harith | [79] |
| 60. | The execution of Okba | [80] |
| 61. | Free liberty granted to Ozza, a prisoner of war | [81] |
| 62. | Abul Ozza proved a traitor and was executed | ib. |
| 63. | The execution of Moavia Ibn Mughira | ib. |
| 64. | Justification of Mughira's execution | [82] |
| 65. | The intended execution of the prisoners of Badr and thewrong version of Sir W. Muir | [83] |
| 66. | Mohammad was never blamed in the Koran for releasing prisoners | [84] |
| 67. | The Koran enjoins the prisoners of war to be either freelyliberated or ransomed, but neither executed nor enslaved | [87] |
| 68. | High treason of the Bani Koreiza against Medina and theirexecution | [88] |
| 69. | The whole of the Bani Koreiza were never executed | ib. |
| 70. | The women and children of Bani Koreiza were never sold | [89] |
| 71. | The exaggerated number of persons executed | [91] |
[XI.—Some Miscellaneous Objections refuted.] | ||
| 72. | The execution of Omm Kirfa for brigandage | [92] |
| 73. | The alleged mutilation of the Urnee robbers | [93] |
| 74. | Amputation or banishment substituted temporarily in place ofimprisonment for want of a well organized system of jails | [95] |
| 75. | Torture of Kinana | [96] |
| 76. | The alleged execution of a singing girl | [97] |
| 77. | The charitable spirit of Mohammad towards his enemies | [98] |
| 78. | Abu Basir not countenanced by the Prophet in contraventionto the spirit of the treaty of Hodeibia | [101] |
| 79. | Nueim not employed by the Prophet to circulate false reportsin the enemy's camp | [102] |
| 80. | Deception in war allowed by the International Law | ib. |
| 81. | Lecky's standard of morality | [104] |
| 82. | The alleged permission to kill the Jews | [106] |
| 83. | Sir W. Muir quoted | [108] |
| 84. | The expulsion of the Bani Nazeer | ib. |
| 85. | Their fruit-trees were not cut down | [109] |
| 86. | Females and the treaty of Hodeibia | [110] |
| 87. | Stanley defended | [111] |
| 88. | Marriage a strict bond of union | [113] |
[The Popular Jihád.] | ||
| 89. | The Koran enjoins only defensive wars | [114] |
| 90. | The Mohammadan Common Law and the Jihád | [116] |
| 91. | When is Jihád a positive injunction | ib. |
| 92. | The Hedáya quoted and refuted | [117] |
| 93. | Rule of interpretation | [118] |
| 94. | The Common Law and its commentators | [119] |
| 95. | Kifáya quoted | [120] |
| 96. | Further quotations | [121] |
| 97. | The Kifáya refuted | [122] |
| 98. | S. IX, 5, discussed | [123] |
| 99. | S. II, 189, discussed | ib. |
| 100. | S. II, 189, and VIII, 40, are defensive | [124] |
| 101. | All injunctions were local and for the time being | [125] |
| 102. | Ainee quoted and refuted | ib. |
| 103. | Sarakhsee quoted and refuted | [126] |
| 104. | Ibn Hajar quoted | [128] |
| 105. | Ibn Hajar refuted | [129] |
| 106. | Halabi quoted | ib. |
| 107. | Halabi refuted | [132] |
| 108. | Ainee again quoted and refuted | ib. |
| 109. | Continuation of the above | [133] |
| 110. | Traditions quoted and refuted | ib. |
| 111. | Early Moslem legists against the Jihád | [134] |
| 112. | Biographical sketches of the legists | [135] |
| 113. | European writers' mistakes | [137] |
| 114. | Sir W. Muir quoted and refuted | [138] |
| 115. | Islam not aggressive | [139] |
| 116. | Mr. Freeman quoted and refuted | [140] |
| 117. | The Revd. Mr. Stephens quoted and refuted | [141] |
| 118. | Mr. Bosworth Smith quoted and refuted | [143] |
| 119. | Mr. George Sale quoted and refuted | ib. |
| 120. | Major Osborn quoted | [146] |
| 121. | Major Osborn refuted | [149] |
| 122. | The IX Sura of the Koran | ib. |
| 123. | The Revd. Mr. Wherry quoted | [150] |
| 124. | Example cited from Jewish history explained | [152] |
| 125. | Mosaic injunctions | [153] |
| 126. | The Revd. Mr. Hughes quoted and refuted | [154] |
| 127. | Meaning of the word Jihád | [155] |
| 128. | Sura XLVIII, 5, explained | [156] |
| 129. | The Revd. Malcolm MacColl quoted | [157] |
| 130. | The untenable theories of the Mohammadan Common Law | 158-161 |
| [APPENDIX A.] | ||
| 1. | Jihád or Jihd in the Koran does not mean war or crusade | [163] |
| 2. | Classical meaning of Jihád, &c. | [164] |
| 3. | Post-classical or technical meaning of Jihád | [165] |
| 4. | The classical logic and Arabian poets | ib. |
| 5. | The conjugation and declination of Jahd or Jihád in the Koran | [166] |
| 6. | The number of instances in which they occur in the Koran | [167] |
| 7. | In what sense they are used in the Koran | [168] |
| 8. | Conventional significations of Jihád | [169] |
| 9. | Mohammadan commentators, &c., quoted | [170] |
| 10. | When the word Jihád was diverted from its original significationto its figurative meaning of waging religious wars | [171] |
| 11. | All verses of the Koran containing the word Jihád and itsderivations quoted and explained | [176] |
| 12. | The above verses quoted with remarks | [177] |
[The Meccan Suras.] | ||
| 13. | Lokman, XXXI, 14 | ib. |
| 14. | Furkan, XXV, 53, 521 | [178] |
| 15. | The Pilgrimage, XXII, 76, 78 | ib. |
| 16. | The Bee, XVI, 108, 111 | [179] |
| 17. | The Spider, XXIX, 5 | [180] |
| 18. | Ibid, 7 | ib. |
| 19. | Ibid, 69 | ib. |
| 20. | The Bee, XVI, 40 | [181] |
| 21. | Creator, XXXV, 40 | ib. |
[The Medinite Suras.] | ||
| 22. | The Cow or Heifer, II, 215 | [182] |
| 23. | Al Amran, III, 136 | ib. |
| 24. | The Spoils, VIII, 73 | [183] |
| 25. | Ibid. 75 | ib. |
| 26. | Ibid. 76 | ib. |
| 27. | The Cattle, VI, 109 | ib. |
| 28. | Mohammad, XLVII, 33 | [184] |
| 29. | Battle Array, LXI, 11 | ib. |
| 30. | Woman. IV. 97 | [185] |
| 31. | Light. XXIV, 52 | ib. |
| 32. | The Forbidding. LXVI, 9 | ib. |
| 33. | The Immunity. IX, 74 | [186] |
| 36. | The Tried, LX, 1 | [187] |
| 35. | Hatib's Story | [188] |
| 36. | The Apartment, XLIX, 15 | ib. |
| 37. | The Immunity, IX, 16 | ib. |
| 38. | Ibid. 19 | ib. |
| 39. | Ibid, 20 | [189] |
| 40. | Ibid, 24 | ib. |
| 41. | Ibid, 41 | ib. |
| 42. | Ibid, 44 | [190] |
| 43. | Ibid, 82 | ib. |
| 44. | Ibid, 87 | ib. |
| 45. | Ibid, 89 | [191] |
| 46. | The Table, V, 39 | ib. |
| 47. | Ibid, 58 | ib. |
| 48. | Ibid, 59 | ib. |
| 49. | Jihád does not mean the waging of war | [192] |
| 50. | Katal and Kitál | ib. |
| 51. | Conclusion | ib. |
| [APPENDIX B.] | ||
| 1. | Slavery and concubinage not allowed by the Koran | [193] |
| 2. | Measures taken by the Koran to abolish future slavery | [194] |
| 3. | None of the prisoners of war was enslaved | [196] |
| 4. | Bani Koreiza not enslaved | [198] |
| 5. | Rihana | [201] |
| 6. | Omar, the second Khalif, liberated all the Arab slaves | [202] |
| 7. | Concubinage | [203] |
| 8. | Maria the Coptic | [204] |
| 9. | Despatch of Mokowkas | [205] |
| 10&11. | Maria neither a slave nor a concubine | [207] |
| 12. | Maria had no son | [209] |
| 13. | The story of Maria and Haphsa a spurious one | [211] |
| 14. | The affair not noticed in the early biographies | [212] |
| 15. | Sir W. Muir's authority not valid | ib. |
| 16. | The best commentators and traditionalists refute the story | [214] |
| 17. | The story not accredited by the Koran | ib. |
| 18. | The story when fabricated | ib. |
| 19. | Zeinab's case | [215] |
| 20. | The story a spurious one | [216] |
| 21. | Sir W. Muir's conjectures not justified | [217] |
| 22. | A wrong translation of Sir W. Muir | [219] |
| 23. | In Zeinab's case no exceptional privilege was secured | [220] |
| 24. | The false story traced to Mukatil | ib. |
| 25. | Katádas conjectural interpretation not warranted | [222] |
| 26. | Other conjectures | [223] |
| [APPENDIX C.] | ||
| I.— | The verses of the Koran referring to the persecution ofthe Koreish at Mecca | [225] |
| II.— | The verses of the Koran referring to the aggressions ofthe Koreish at Medina as well as those of the inhabitantsthereof | ib. |
| III.— | The verses of the Koran alluding to the wars of defenceagainst the Koreish and Arabs, &c., with several referencesto their aggressions | ib. |
| IV.— | The verses of the Koran alluding to the various battles | [226] |