By his Royal Declaration, of date the 18th of June 1639, his Majesty, referring to the various supplications, &c. of his Scotch subjects, was “pleased to declare and assure that, according to the Petitioners’ humble desires, all matters ecclesiastical shall be determined by an Assembly of the Kirk, and matters civil in the Parliament, and other inferior judicatories established by law; and Assemblies, accordingly, shall be kept once a year, or as shall be agreed upon at the next General Assembly.
“And for settling the general distractions of that our antient Kingdom, our will and pleasure is, that a Frie General Assembly be kept at Edinʳ the 6ᵗʰ day of August next ensuing, where we intend (God willing) to be personally present, and for the legal indiction thereof, we have given orders and command to our Council; and thereafter a Parliament to be holden at Edinburgh the 20ᵗʰ day of August next ensuing, for ratifying of what shall be concluded in the said Assembly,” &c.[158]
To this declaration seven articles were annexed, the chief of which were—the immediate disbanding of the forces of Scotland—the surrendering to the King all the castles, forts, regalia, &c.—all fortifications; and meetings not sanctioned by Act of Parliament, to be desisted from: and, on the other part, his Majesty to withdraw all his ships, &c. on delivery of the fortresses.
On considering this Declaration and the Articles, the Scotch Commissioners, (viz., Rothes, Dunfermline, Lowdon, W. Douglas, Alexander Henderson, and Archibald Johnston,) on the part of the Covenanters, subscribed the following document, which completed the pacification:—
“In obedience to his Majestys Royal commands, we shall, upon Thursday next, the 20 of this June, dismiss our forces, and immediately thereafter deliver his Majesties Castles; and shall ever, in all things, carry ourselves like humble, loyal, and obedient subjects.”
And thus, to the great joy and rejoicing of both armies, this pacification was consummated, without bloodshed; and the several hosts dispersed themselves and retired to their homes. The Covenanters, with perfect good faith, surrendered the fortresses, Regalia, and all that they had seized as sureties for their safety; but they were too well aware of the craft with which they had to cope, to omit all needful precautions against the perfidy of their adversaries. It was his necessity, and not his will, that induced the King really to yield (though his apologists call it concede) to the Scotch army, the terms recorded in his Declaration; and, reluctant as we are to think harshly of that misguided Monarch, or to anticipate the judgment which our readers may form, on examination of the evidence which we have gleaned, or to obtrude our own humble reflections on the occurrences which we record—we cannot stifle an expression of our full conviction, that, in entering into that treaty of pacification, Charles I. did it with a settled purpose to violate his faith as a man and a King; and that, with regard to it and its fulfilment, he was guided by principles the most jesuitical, dishonourable, and immoral. The documents which follow, contain the most conclusive proofs of a paltry, pettifogging dissimulation, such as is scarcely to be paralleled in the whole range of authentic history.[159]
But we leave this painful topic, and pass on to the incidents more immediately introductory to the meeting of Assembly.
In reference to this, one of the ticklish points connected with it was, that, in the negotiations, the King would not recognise the Assembly of the preceding year as a lawful Assembly, while the Scotch Commissioners would not relinquish its character of legality; and, therefore, it was understood, that, without assuming anything on that point, the Assembly of 1639 should proceed de novo to consider all affairs ecclesiastic. The policy of the King and his councillors—Hamilton, Traquair, and certainly Canterbury and the Scotch Prelates—was, if possible, to prevent a recognition of its lawfulness or its Acts, and to mould the proceedings of the next Assembly and Parliament so as to defeat the Presbyterian polity, and pave the way for the resumption of high regal prerogative, (“the Kingly way,” as Hamilton termed it,) and the restoration of Episcopacy. It is necessary thus far to anticipate what will be found more fully developed in the King’s Instructions and other documents, in order that the reader may be prepared, as he advances, to perceive the bearing of the proceedings which ensued.
The King, if ever he seriously purposed to attend the Assembly in person, speedily relinquished the idea; and, indeed, his personal attendance would have been very inconvenient, considering the crooked policy by which, at the time, he was guided. He might have felt very serious embarrassment in managing personally, the refined duplicity of his schemes; and having, as is fully proved, a purpose of putting his veto upon anything that might be concluded either in the Assembly or Parliament, which was not in entire accordance with his own notions, (and he could not reasonably expect that they should be so,) it was more expedient to act by a Commissioner—whose acts he might disavow and repudiate—than to compromise himself by a personal appearance and a collision with the Scottish Covenanters on their own ground. He wished Hamilton to be his Commissioner once more; but that nobleman was too wary, after his former experiences, to attempt it; and Traquair was selected for this important office. His Lordship waited on the King at Whitehall in the beginning of August; and, on the 6th, his Commission was signed, and he set out for Scotland.
Without farther prefatory explanation, therefore, we now proceed to give the Acts and proceedings of the Assembly which convened at Edinburgh on the 12th of August 1639, adhering to the same arrangement as in the former part of this work.