[112] Theile, zur Biographie Jesu, § 15, Anm. 9. Hoffmann, s. 269. [↑]
[113] Comp. my Streitschriften, i. 1, s. 42 f.; George, s. 39. [↑]
[114] Neander, L. J. Ch. s. 27. [↑]
[115] Schleiermacher (Ueber den Lukas, s. 47), explains the narrative concerning the magi as a symbolical one; but he scorns to take into consideration the passages from the O. T. and other writings, which have a bearing on the subject, and by way of retribution, his exposition at one time rests in generalities, at another, takes a wrong path. [↑]
[116] Lightfoot, Horæ, p. 202. [↑]
[117] Schneckenburger, Ueber den Ursprung des ersten kanonischen Evangeliums, s. 69 ff. [↑]
[118] Thus, e.g. Augustin de consensu evangelistarum, ii. 5. Storr, opusc. acad. iii. s. 96 ff. Süskind, in Bengel’s Archiv. i. 1, s. 216 ff. [↑]
[119] E.g. Hess, Geschichte Jesu, 1, s. 51 ff. Paulus, Olshausen, in loc. [↑]
[120] Süskind, ut sup. s. 222. [↑]
[121] The same difference as to the chronological relation of the two incidents exists between the two different texts of the apocryphal book: Historia de nativitate Mariæ et de inf. Serv., see Thilo, p. 385, not. [↑]