[43] Against the offence which it has pleased Tholuck (Glaubw. s. 41) to take at this expression (Verwischen), comp. the Aphorismen zur Apologie des Dr. Strauss und seines Werkes, s. 69 f. [↑]
[44] L. J. 1, b, s. 165 f. [↑]
[45] Vom Zweck J. und seiner Jünger, s. 124. [↑]
[48] Vid. Lücke, in loc.; Hase, L. J., § 135. [↑]
[49] Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 567. [↑]
[50] Lücke, 2, s. 599; Hase, ut sup.; Olshausen, 2. s. 435. [↑]
[51] How can Lücke explain the omission of the kiss of Judas in the Gospel of John from its having been too notorious a fact? and how can he adduce as an analogous instance the omission of the transaction between the betrayer and the Sanhedrim by John? for this, as something passing behind the scenes, might very well be left out, but by no means an incident which, like that kiss, happened so conspicuously in the foreground and centre of the scene. [↑]
[52] So says the Jew of Celsus, Orig. c. Cels. ii. 9: ἐπειδὴ ἡμεῖς ἐλέγξαντες αὐτὸν καὶ καταγνόντες ἠστιοῦμεν κολάζεσθαι, κρυπτόμενος μὲν καὶ διαδιδράσκων ἐπονειδιστότατα ἑάλω. When we, having convicted and condemned him, had determined that he should suffer punishment; concealing himself, and endeavouring to escape, he experienced a most shameful capture. [↑]