[53] Lücke, 2, s. 597 f.; Olshausen, 2, s. 435; Tholuck, s. 299. The reference to the murderer of Coligny is, however, unwarranted, as any one will find who will look into the book incorrectly cited by Tholuck: Serrani commentatorium de statu religionis et reip. in regno Galliæ, L. x. p. 32, b. The murderer was not in the least withheld from the prosecution of his design by the firmness of the noble old man. Comp. also Schiller, Werke, 16 Bd. s. 382 f., 384; Ersch and Gruber’s Encyclopädie, 7 Band, s. 452 f. Such inaccuracies in the department of modern history cannot indeed excite surprise in a writer who elsewhere (Glaubwürdigkeit, s. 437) speaks of the duke of Orleans, Louis Philippe’s father, as the brother of Louis XVI. How can a knowledge so diversified as that of Dr. Tholuck be always quite accurate. [↑]
[54] Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 570. [↑]
[56] As Lücke, Tholuck and Olshausen, in loc. [↑]
[57] Schleiermacher, über den Lukas, s. 290. [↑]
[58] Paulus, exeg. Handb. 3, b, s. 576. [↑]
[59] Paulus, ut sup. s. 577; Olshausen, 2, s. 244. [↑]
[60] Thus e.g. Erasmus, in loc. [↑]
[61] Thus Winer, N. T. Gramm., § 41, 5; Tholuck and Lücke, in loc. [↑]