92. Hence another view of real essence as unknown qualities of unknown body.
93. How Locke mixes up these two meanings in ambiguity about body.
94. Body as ‘parcel of matter’ without essence.
95. In this sense body is the mere individuum.
96. Body as qualified by circumstances of time and place.
97. Such body Locke held to be subject of ‘primary qualities’: but are these compatible with particularity in time?
98. How Locke avoids this question.
99. Body and its qualities supposed to be outside consciousness.
100. How can primary qualities be outside consciousness, and yet knowable?
101. Locke answers that they copy themselves in ideas—Berkeley’s rejoinder. Locke gets out of the difficulty by his doctrine of solidity.