From the circumstance of the nature of the impelling power having been concealed by the inventor it is impossible to say in what this machine consisted, or even whether steam exerted any agency whatever in it, or, if it did, whether it might not have been, as was most probably the case, a reproduction of Hero's contrivance. It is rather unfavourable to the claims advanced by the advocates of the Spaniard, that although it is admitted that he was rewarded and promoted in consequence of the experiment, yet it does not appear that it was again tried, much less brought into practical use.
SOLOMON DE CAUS, 1615.
Fig.2.
(25.) A work entitled "Les Raisons des Forces Mouvantes, avec diverses Machines tant utiles que plaisantes," published at Frankfort in 1615, by Solomon de Caus, a native of France, contains the following theorem:—
"Water will mount by the help of fire higher than its level," which is explained and proved in the following terms:—
"The third method of raising water is by the aid of fire. On this principle may be constructed various machines: I shall here describe one. Let a ball of copper marked A, well soldered in every part, to which is attached a tube and stopcock marked D, by which water may be introduced; and also another tube marked B C, which will be soldered into the top of the ball, and the lower end C of which shall descend nearly to the bottom of the ball without touching it. Let the said ball be filled with water through the tube D, then shutting the stopcock D, and opening the stopcock in the vertical tube B C, let the ball be placed upon a fire, the heat acting upon the said ball will cause the water to rise in the tube B C."
Such is the description of the apparatus of De Caus as given by himself; and on this has been founded a claim to the invention of the steam engine. It will be observed, that neither in the original theorem nor in the description of the machine which accompanies it, is the word steam anywhere used. Now it was well known, by all conversant in physics, long before the date of the publication containing this description, that atmospheric air when heated acquires an increased elastic force. As the experiment is described, the other part of the ball A is filled with atmospheric air; the heat of the fire acting upon the air through the external surface of the ball, and likewise transmitted through the water, would of course raise the temperature of the air contained in the vessel, would thereby increase its elasticity, and would cause the water to rise in the tube B C, upon a physical principle altogether independent of the qualities of steam. The effect produced, therefore, is just what might have been expected by any one acquainted with the common properties of air, though entirely ignorant of those of steam; and, in point of fact, the pressure of the air is as much concerned in this case in raising the water as the pressure of the steam.
This objection, however, is combated by another theorem contained in the same work, in which De Caus speaks of "the strength of the vapour produced by the action of the fire, which causes water to mount; which vapour will issue from the stopcock with great violence after the water has been expelled."