[256] Feuillerat, Eliz. 109, 119, 124, 125, 126. Possibly the amounts of imprests are in some years to be added.
[257] Feuillerat, Eliz. 130, 135.
[258] Patent in Feuillerat, 58.
[259] Patent in Feuillerat, 72.
[260] Feuillerat, 408, from S. P. D. Eliz. Add. xx. 101; Collier, i. 230, who thinks that the application was for the Mastership of the Revels.
[261] Feuillerat, Eliz. 409; Collier, i. 191; from Lansd. MS. 13; cf. ch. v.
[262] Feuillerat, Eliz. 429. He died in debt, and his will was not proved until 1577 (Chalmers, 482). This led me into thinking (Tudor Revels, 26) that during 1572-7 he was alive, but not actively exercising his functions, and possibly into some injustice in suggesting that he had 'in the end proved an extravagant and unbusinesslike Master'. Yet Blagrave's memorandum of 1573 (vide infra) seems to lay a special stress on the importance of appointing a Master who shall be 'neither gallant, prodigall, nedye, nor gredye'.
[263] Feuillerat, Eliz. 187, 456, correcting Collier, i. 198 and Tudor Revels, 26.
[264] Feuillerat, Eliz. 157, 160, 172, 178.
[265] Ibid. 186.