[266] Tudor Revels, 28; Feuillerat, Eliz. 416; from Lansd. MS. 83, f. 145, misdated in pencil 'July 1597'.
[267] Tudor Revels, 29; Feuillerat, Eliz. 412; from Lansd. MS. 83, f. 147. Dodmer was still pursuing a claim in the Court of Requests in May 1576 (Feuillerat, Eliz. 413).
[268] Text in full in Tudor Revels, 1, 31, and Feuillerat, Eliz. 5, from Lansd. MS. 83, f. 158.
[269] Feuillerat, Eliz. 432, points out that, as Elizabeth's Privy Council is referred to, these ordinances can hardly have been those of Cawarden (cf. p. 74) as I suggested in Tudor Revels, 34.
[270] Text in full in Tudor Revels, 42, and Feuillerat, Eliz. 17, from Lansd. MS. 83, f. 154. The time-references agree with 1573 or 1574, if Blagrave's unestablished service in the Revels began as early as 1546.
[271] Lansd. MS. 83, f. 149. The reference to two years' debts suggests a date, when compared with Dodmer's, in the summer of 1574; if so, the writer will be Fish, rather than Arnold.
[272] Feuillerat, Eliz. 164.
[273] A Declared Account for 14 Feb. 1578 to 14 Feb. 1579 is in Blagrave's name.
[274] Feuillerat, Eliz. 212, 218, 238, 247, 267, 277, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300.
[275] Ibid. 192, 266, 277, 297, 301.