The Nansen bottle, shown being attached to a hydrographic wire, is one of the standard tools of oceanology. When a bottle reaches a desired depth, a sliding weight tips it upside down to collect seawater samples. Thermometers on the sides of the bottles record temperature. The device was designed by the Norwegian oceanographer and explorer, Fridtjof Nansen. (See photo on [page 56].)
In order to evaluate the effects of these materials in the ocean environment, it is necessary to know many things. Just how much radiation is introduced? In what form? Where geographically? How are these radionuclides dispersed or concentrated physically, chemically, biologically, and geologically? What is the net result in each case now, and what will it be many years hence?
These questions are not answered easily. There is, as yet, no satisfactory laboratory substitute for the open ocean. Research for the most part must be conducted at sea, where tests and measurements are difficult at best, and where results therefore are often suspect. Further, if we are to study the effects of man-induced changes in a natural environment, it would have been advantageous to have known the nature of that environment before the changes were introduced—which, by and large, in the case of the ocean we do not. So we must start with a contaminated environment and try to separate what we have put there ourselves from what would have been there anyway. It isn’t an easy task to make the physical and biological observations that will make this distinction.
| Table II CONCENTRATION AND AMOUNTS OF 42 OF THE ELEMENTS IN SEAWATER | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Element | Concentration (mg/l) | Amount of element in seawater (tons mile³) | Total amount in the oceans (tons) |
| Chlorine | 19,000.0 | 89.5 × 10⁶ | 29.3 × 10¹⁵ |
| Sodium | 10,500.0 | 49.5 x-10⁶ | 16.3 × 10¹⁵ |
| Magnesium | 1,350.0 | 6.4 × 10⁶ | 2.1 × 10¹⁵ |
| Sulphur | 885.0 | 4.2 × 10⁶ | 1.4 × 10¹⁵ |
| Calcium | 400.0 | 1.9 × 10⁶ | 0.6 × 10¹⁵ |
| Potassium | 380.0 | 1.8 × 10⁶ | 0.6 × 10¹⁵ |
| Bromine | 65.0 | 306,000 | 0.1 × 10¹⁵ |
| Carbon | 28.0 | 132,000 | 0.04 × 10¹⁵ |
| Strontium | 8.0 | 38,000 | 12,000 × 10⁹ |
| Boron | 4.6 | 23,000 | 7,100 × 10⁹ |
| Silicon | 3.0 | 14,000 | 4,700 × 10⁹ |
| Lithium | 0.17 | 800 | 260 × 10⁹ |
| Rubidium | 0.12 | 570 | 190 × 10⁹ |
| Phosphorus | 0.07 | 330 | 110 × 10⁹ |
| Iodine | 0.06 | 280 | 93 × 10⁹ |
| Barium | 0.03 | 140 | 47 × 10⁹ |
| Indium | 0.02 | 94 | 31 × 10⁹ |
| Zinc | 0.01 | 47 | 16 × 10⁹ |
| Iron | 0.01 | 47 | 16 × 10⁹ |
| Aluminum | 0.01 | 47 | 16 × 10⁹ |
| Molybdenum | 0.01 | 47 | 16 × 10⁹ |
| Selenium | 0.004 | 19 | 6 × 10⁹ |
| Tin | 0.003 | 14 | 5 × 10⁹ |
| Copper | 0.003 | 14 | 5 × 10⁹ |
| Arsenic | 0.003 | 14 | 5 × 10⁹ |
| Uranium | 0.003 | 14 | 5 × 10⁹ |
| Nickel | 0.002 | 9 | 3 × 10⁹ |
| Vanadium | 0.002 | 9 | 3 × 10⁹ |
| Manganese | 0.002 | 9 | 3 × 10⁹ |
| Antimony | 0.0005 | 2 | 0.8 × 10⁹ |
| Cobalt | 0.0005 | 2 | 0.8 × 10⁹ |
| Caesium | 0.0005 | 2 | 0.8 × 10⁹ |
| Cerium | 0.0004 | 2 | 0.6 × 10⁹ |
| Silver | 0.0003 | 1 | 5 × 10⁸ |
| Cadmium | 0.0001 | 0.5 | 150 × 10⁶ |
| Tungsten | 0.0001 | 0.5 | 150 × 10⁶ |
| Chromium | 0.00005 | 0.2 | 78 × 10⁶ |
| Thorium | 0.00005 | 0.2 | 78 × 10⁶ |
| Lead | 0.00003 | 0.1 | 46 × 10⁶ |
| Mercury | 0.00003 | 0.1 | 46 × 10⁶ |
| Gold | 0.000004 | 0.02 | 6 × 10⁶ |
| Radium | 1 × 10⁻¹⁰ | 5 × 10⁻⁷ | 150 |
Adapted from The Mineral Resources of the Sea, by John L. Mero, American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1964.
Many sea creatures are efficient, selective concentrators of “trace elements”, which occur in seawater only in minute portions. These elements are difficult enough to detect qualitatively and all but impossible to analyze quantitatively. Yet among the elements the sea’s plants and animals concentrate are the very materials with which we are apt to be most concerned: Strontium, cesium, cerium, ruthenium, cobalt, iodine, phosphorus, zinc, manganese, iron, chromium, and others. Radioisotopes[6] of all these elements occur as by-products of human nuclear activities. Many concentrating organisms are microscopic in size and are frequently impossible to raise in captivity. It is apparent that we are faced with a research program of considerable challenge and proportion.
We need to know how each marine species concentrates. Is it from the food it eats, by absorption from the water, or both? Does it concentrate an element by continuous accumulation, or is there a constant turnover of the material in the organism’s system? (In the first case, once the creature became radioactive it would remain so throughout its life or until the radioactivity decayed. In the second case, however, the radioactivity might be a transient condition, assuming the creature could find its way into uncontaminated water and were able to flush itself.) Obviously, both the cycling time of the radioisotope in the organism and its radioactive half-life[7] must be taken into account.
Even if we should manage to identify all the marine concentrators and gain some insight into their metabolic processes, this would be only a first step. For example, one tiny form of planktonic protozoan, acantharia, concentrates up to 15% of its own weight of strontium, including the radioisotope strontium-90. It is eaten by larger zooplankton (animals), such as copepods, which are eaten by little fish, which, in turn, are eaten by bigger fish, etc. Somewhere along this food chain, perhaps, a fish will come along that is favored for human dinner tables. How much strontium-90 has that fish accumulated through swallowing its prey and by absorption from the water? Is the radioactivity in its scales, bones, viscera, and other usually uneaten portions, or in its flesh?
It is probable, though as yet by no means proven, that among the million or so oceanic species of plant and animal life, there are concentrators of virtually all the 60 or more elements found in seawater. To identify and study them is an enormous undertaking, which is often possible only by using radioisotopes as tools.