IN TWO VOLUMES.
VOL. II.
Volume I is also available from Project Gutenberg
TORONTO:
WILLIAM BRIGGS, 80 KING STREET EAST;
JAMES CAMPBELL & SON, AND WILLING & WILLIAMSON.
MONTREAL: DAWSON BROTHERS.
1880.
Entered, according to the Act of the Parliament of Canada, in the year One thousand eight hundred and eighty, by the Rev. Egerton Ryerson, D.D., LL.D, in the Office of the Minister of Agriculture.
CONTENTS.
[CHAPTER XXVII.]
- Alliance between Congress and France not productive of the effect anticipated; efforts
of the British Government for reconciliation with the Colonies 1-16 - Alliance deferred twelve months by France after it was applied for by Congress, until the King of France
was assured that no reconciliation would take place between England and the Colonies [1] - Lord Admiral Howe and his brother, General Howe, Commissioners to confer with Congress with a view
to reconciliation; their power limited; Congress refuses all conference with them, but the vast majority of
the Colonists in favour of reconciliation [2] - Reasons of the failure of the two Commissioners [4]
- New penal laws against the Loyalists [5]
- Three Acts of Parliament passed to remove all grounds of complaint on the part of the Colonists, and the appointment of five Commissioners; Lord North's conciliatory
speech; excitement and opposition in the
Commons, but the bills were passed and received the royal assent [6] - Lord North's proposed resignation, and preparations for it [8]
- Opinions of Lords Macaulay and Mahon as to the success of a commission; proposed terms of reconciliation
if appointed and proposed by the Earl of Chatham [8] - The large powers and most liberal propositions of the five Royal Commissioners for reconciliation between
the Colonies and the Mother Country [11] - The refusal of all negotiation on the part of Congress; bound by treaty to the King of France to make no
peace with England without the consent of the French Court [12] - The three Acts of Parliament, and proposals of the five Commissioners of all that the Colonists had desired
before the Declaration of Independence; but Congress had transferred allegiance from England to France,
without even consulting their constituents [12] - Appeal of the representative of France to the Canadians to detach Canada from England (in a [note]) [12]
- Sycophancy of the leaders of Congress to France against England [13]
- The feeling of the people in both England and America different from that of the leaders of Congress [14]
- The war more acrimonious after the alliance between Congress and the Kingof France and the failure
of the British Commissioners to promote reconciliation between Great Britain and the Colonies [16]