According to Babinski, Sebileau’s explanation that such matters as loss of reflexes could be explained by autosuggestion is erroneous.
Re muscular hypertonus in reflex cases, Babinski remarks that though it may be very pronounced, it is as a rule restricted in area. Re sensory disorders in reflex cases, pains are found (they were very slight ones in the present case); hypesthesia has also been found by Babinski.
Localized catalepsy: Hysterotraumatic.
Case 389. (Sollier, January, 1917.)
An invalided soldier had been suffering for a year with marked atrophies and the right knee in extension. There had been a bullet wound of the upper third of the tibia, which did not affect the joint. There was a total anesthesia, both superficial and deep, which stopped sharply at the upper part of the thigh. At the time of the very first examination, this apparent ankylosis was reduced, to the great stupefaction of the patient. There was, however, a peculiar phenomenon in this subject. There was a localized catalepsy of the limb, which was able to preserve any desired attitude in which it was placed; and this attitude could be indefinitely prolonged, just as in cataleptic hysterics. Here, then, was a case of localized hystero-traumatism precisely imitating the classical hysteria of Charcot except for its localization.
Re hysterotraumatism, Charcot developed ideas concerning trauma and localized hysteria in 1886, thereby overthrowing the ideas of Erichsen concerning the organic nature of “railway spine” and “railway brain” as developed twenty years before. In a case of local trauma such as the bullet-wound of [Case 388], Babinski’s explanation would be that the pain and inhibition of movement resulting from the bullet wound at the time of injury, formed the focus of a process of autosuggestion. According to Babinski’s figure, the organic factor acts as a bait for the hysterical symptoms. According to the Salpêtrière experience, hysteria is incapable of producing a real superficial and deep anesthesia such as is mentioned for this case. For example, no hysterical patient in the Charcot clinic, according to Sicard, could undergo a scalpel operation without some general or local anesthetic. When, therefore, a true deep anesthesia occurs, Sicard’s conception would be that the anesthesia is not a truly hysterical one but belongs to the group of physiopathic phenomena.
Contracture: Hysterotraumatic.