p. [406], n. 3. Dīk͟htān or Daik͟htān seems right. It is so in both the I.O. MSS.
p. [406], l. 11 from foot. These muhrs were probably of silver, and were called muhrs because they were medals rather than coins. Dr. Kehr has given an account of a large muhr which is now apparently in Dresden. See also Richardson’s Dict., article Sikka.
p. [407], l. 4. This is Jūna K͟hān, son of G͟hiyās̤u-d-dīn Tug͟hluq. He ascended the throne in 1325 under the title of Muḥammad bin Tug͟hluq.
p. [407], l. 15. This is the prince known as Naṣīru-d-dīn. He ascended the throne as Muḥammad bin Fīrūz in 1387, and again in 1390.
p. [413], ll. 11 and 3 from foot. I.O. MSS. show that Sar-farāz should be Sarafrāz; apparently his present was ‘seven bullock-carts’ (haft rās gāw bahal) and not two bullocks.
p. [417], n. 2. Cancel note. Nārangsar seems right.
p. [417], l. 2 from foot. The words are dah bīst wazn muhr u rūpiya maʿmūl. Elliot, p. 354, renders this ‘ten and twenty times heavier than the current gold muhr and rupee.’
p. [418], l. 10. See n. 2 in Elliot, vi, 355. Apparently Jahāngīr means that he was the first person to coin double muhrs and double rupees. There is an account of tankas in the Bahār-i-ʿAjam, 261, col 2, p. 421, n. 2. But it is 27 in I.O. MSS. 113, p. 423, l. 14. A t̤assū is more than a finger-breadth, it is the 1/24 of a gaz or yard, and should be about 1⅓ inches.
p. [437]. I am indebted to my friend Dr. Hoernle for the explanation of the names of the two sects of Sewras. They should be Tapā and Kharatara. Mān Singh’s name in religion was Jīn-simha. See Epigraphia Indica, i, 37, and Ind. Antiquary, xi, 250. Mān Singh died at Mairtha (in Jodhpūr) according to the Jain books, in the beginning of 1618. The head of the Tapā sect in Jahāngīr’s time was Vījayasena. There is an elaborate paper on the Jains of Gujarat and Marwar by Colonel Miles in the Transactions R.A.S., iii, pp. 335–71.
p. [442], l. 8. There is no previous reference to the outbreak of plague in Kashmir, though there is one to its occurrence in the Panjab. There is an interesting account of the plague in K͟hāfī K͟hān, i, 286–8, in which the description is carried down to the time of Aurangzīb.