| PAGE. | |||||||||
| PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION | [VII] | ||||||||
| PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION | [XI] | ||||||||
| PRELIMINARY NOTE TO THE SEVENTH AND EIGHTH EDITION | [XIII] | ||||||||
| TRANSLATOR’S NOTE | [XV] | ||||||||
PART I | |||||||||
| CHAP. | |||||||||
| I. | BELIEFS ABOUT THE SOUL AND CULT OF SOULSIN THE HOMERIC POEMS | [3] | |||||||
| II. | ISLANDS OF THE BLEST. Translation | [55] | |||||||
| III. | CAVE DEITIES. SUBTERRANEANTranslation | [88] | |||||||
| IV. | HEROES | [115] | |||||||
| V. | THE CULTOF SOULS | [156] | |||||||
| I. | Cult of Chthonic Deities | [158] | |||||||
| II. | Funeral ceremonies and worship of the dead | [162] | |||||||
| III. | Traces of the Cult of Souls in the Blood Feud andSatisfaction for murder | [174] | |||||||
| VI. | THE ELEUSINIAN MYSTERIES | [217] | |||||||
| VII. | IDEAS OF THE FUTURE LIFE | [236] | |||||||
PART II | |||||||||
| VIII. | ORIGINS OF THE BELIEF IN IMMORTALITY. THE THRACIAN WORSHIPOF DIONYSOS | [253] | |||||||
| IX. | DIONYSIAC RELIGION IN GREECE. ITS AMALGAMATION WITH APOLLINE RELIGION. ECSTATIC PROPHECY. RITUAL PURIFICATION AND EXORCISM. ASCETICISM | [282] | |||||||
| X. | THE ORPHICS | [335] | |||||||
| XI. | THE PHILOSOPHERS | [362] | |||||||
| XII. | THE LAY AUTHORS (LYRIC POETS—PINDAR—THE TRAGEDIANS) | [411] | |||||||
vi | |||||||||
| XIII. | PLATO | [463] | |||||||
| XIV. | THE LATER AGE OF THE GREEK WORLD | [490] | |||||||
| I. | Philosophy | [490] | |||||||
| II. | Popular Belief | [524] | |||||||
APPENDIX | |||||||||
| I. | Consecration of persons struck by lightning | [581] | |||||||
| II. | μασχαλισμός | [582] | |||||||
| III. | ἀμύητοι, ἄγαμοι, Danaids in the lower world | [586] | |||||||
| IV. | The Tetralogies of Antiphon | [588] | |||||||
| V. | Ritual Purification | [588] | |||||||
| VI. | Hekate and the Ἑκατικὰ φάσματα | [590] | |||||||
| VII. | The Hosts of Hekate | [593] | |||||||
| VIII. | Disintegration of Consciousness and Reduplication ofPersonality | [595] | |||||||
| IX. | The Great Orphic Theogony | [596] | |||||||
| X. | Previous Lives of Pythagoras. His Descent to Hades | [598] | |||||||
| XI. | Initiation considered as Adoption by the god | [601] | |||||||
| XII. | Magical Exorcisms of the Dead | [603] | |||||||
| [INDEX] | [607] | ||||||||
| [Transcriber’s Note and Extended List of Abbreviations] | [end] | ||||||||
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
THIS book offers an account of the opinions held by the Greeks about the life of the human soul after death, and is thus intended as a contribution to the history of Greek religion. Such an undertaking has in a special measure to contend with the difficulties that face any inquiry into the religious life and thought of the Greeks. Greek religion was a natural growth, not a special foundation, and the ideas and feelings which gave it its inward tone and outward shape never received abstract formulation. It expressed itself in religious performances alone: it had no sacred books from which we might determine the inward meaning and interconnexion of the ideas with which the Greeks approached the gods created by their faith. The central essence of the religion held by the Greek people, in spite of this absence of conceptual formulation—or perhaps because of it—preserved its original character to a remarkable degree: the speculations and fancies of Greek poets continually refer to this central nucleus. Indeed the poets and philosophers in such of their writings as have come down to us are our only authorities for the religious thought of the Greeks. In the present inquiry they have naturally had to be our guides for the greater part of the way. But though under the special conditions of Greek life the religious views of poets and philosophers represent an important side of Greek religion, they yet allow us to perceive very clearly the independent and self-determined position with regard to the ancestral religion retained by the individual. The individual believer might always, if his own temper and disposition allowed him, give himself up to the plain and unsophisticated emotions which had shaped and decided the faith of the people and the religious performances of popular εὐσέβεια. But we should know very little of the religious ideas that filled the mind of the believing Greek if we had to do without the evidence of philosophers and poets (and of some Attic orators as well) in whose words dumb and inarticulate emotion finds expression. The inquirer would, however, be entirely on the wrong track [viii] and be led to some remarkable conclusions who ventured without more ado to deduce from the religious ideas that find expression in Greek literature a complete Theology of the Greek people. Where direct literary statements and allusions fail us we are left with nothing but surmises in face of the religion of the Greeks and its inmost guiding forces. Of course there are plenty of people of sanguine temperament and industrious fancy who find no difficulty in producing for our benefit the most admirable solutions of the problem. Others in varying degrees of good faith press the emotions of Christian piety into the service of explaining ancient faith in gods. Thus injustice is done to both forms of religion and an understanding of the essentials of Greek belief in its true and independent reality is made completely impossible. A good example of this is provided by the Eleusinian Mysteries, and by that favourite topic of controversy (which has, indeed, received more than its due share of attention from students of religion), the amalgamation of the worship of gods and the belief in Souls said to have taken place therein. Nowhere else has the complete unprofitableness of the attempt to make use of the shifting ideas and tendencies of modern civilization to explain the underlying motive forces of these significant cult practices, been more strikingly and repeatedly demonstrated. On this head in particular the author of the present work has renounced all attempts to cast a fitful and ambiguous light upon the venerable gloom of the subject by the help of the farthing dip of his own private imaginings. There is no denying that here as in so many departments of ancient εὐσέβεια there is something greater and finer that eludes our grasp. The revealing word, never having been written down, has been lost. Instead of trying to find a substitute in modern catch phrases it seems better simply to describe, in the plainest and most literal fashion, the actual phenomena of Greek piety exactly as they are known to us. There will be plenty of opportunity for the author’s own suggestions and they need not always obtrude themselves. The aim of this work is to make plain the facts of the Greek Cult of Souls and of that belief in immortality the inner workings of which are only partially intelligible to our most sympathetic efforts to understand them. To give a clearer presentation of the origin and development of those practices and those beliefs; to distinguish the transformations through which they passed and their relationship with other and kindred intellectual tendencies; to disentangle the many different lines of thought and speculation from the inextricable [ix] confusion in which they lie in many minds (and in many books) and to let them stand out clearly and distinctly one from another, seemed particularly desirable. Why this design has not been carried out by the same methods throughout; why it has sometimes seemed sufficient to give a bald summary of the essential points, while at other times certain topics are pursued into their most distant ramifications (sometimes with apparently irrelevant prolixity), will be obvious enough to those who are familiar with the subject. Where a more careful examination of the overflowing mass of detail was to be attempted advantage has been taken of the Appendix to achieve a greater, though still only a relative degree of completeness. This was made possible by the lengthy period which elapsed between the publication of the two parts of the book. The first half [to the end of chapter vii] appeared as long ago as the spring of 1890. Unpropitious circumstances have delayed the completion of the remainder till the present moment. The two parts could easily be kept separate (as they have been): in the main they fall apart and correspond to the two sides of the question indicated in the title of the book—Cult of Souls and Belief in Immortality. The Cult of Souls and the faith in immortality may eventually come together at some points, but they have a different origin and travel most of the way on separate paths. The conception of immortality in particular arises from a spiritual intuition which reveals the souls of men as standing in close relationship, and indeed as being of like substance, with the everlasting gods. And simultaneously the gods are regarded as being in their nature like the soul of man, i.e. as free spirits needing no material or visible body. (It is this spiritualized view of the gods—not the belief in gods itself as Aristotle supposes in the remarkable statement quoted by Sextus Empiricus Adv. Mathematicos, iii, 20 ff.—which arises from the vision of its own divine nature achieved by the soul καθ’ ἑαυτήν relieved of the body, in ἐνθουσιασμοί and μαντεῖαι.) And this conception leads far away from the ideas on which the Cult of Souls was based.
The publication of the book in two parts has brought with it a regrettable circumstance for which I must ask the indulgence of well-disposed readers (that the first half found so many of them is a fact which I must gratefully acknowledge). As the dimensions of the whole work grew beyond expectation and almost overstepped the μέτρον αὔταρκες, the sixteen excursuses which were promised in [x] the first volume have had to be dropped: the book would otherwise have been overloaded. So far as they possess independent interest they will find a place elsewhere. They are real excursuses and were intended as such, and the proper understanding of the book will not be affected by their absence.
ERWIN ROHDE.
HEIDELBERG.
November 1st, 1893.
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
THE publication of a second edition of this book affords me a welcome opportunity of making my account more exact and to the point in certain places; of adding some points that had been overlooked or omitted; and of noticing with approval or disapproval some divergent opinions that had obtained currency in the interval. Controversy is, however, confined within the narrowest limits and to points of minor importance (and only then in answer to more serious and significant objections). The plan and—if I may say so—the style of the whole book demanded throughout, and more especially in the great points at issue, a purely positive statement of my own views and the results of my own studies. Such a statement, it may well be imagined, was not arrived at without being preceded in the mind of the author by a controversial reckoning with the manifold views and doctrines of others upon the subjects here dealt with—views which in some cases he felt obliged to reject. Controversy in this sense lies behind every page of the book, though as a rule only in a latent condition. In this condition I have been content to let it remain in this revised edition of the book. My opinions were not arrived at without toil and much careful reflection; one view being made to reinforce another till they were all bound together in a single closely-knitted whole. Neither further reflection on my part nor the criticisms of others have shaken my belief in the tenability of opinions reached in this way. I have therefore ventured to leave my account unaltered in all its main points. I hope that it contains its own justification and defence in itself without further vindication on my part.