“Acyclic (spiral-leaved) flowers are older than cyclic (verticillate-leaved) with a definite number, comparing, of course, only those with the same fundamental structure. The Veronica-type must be considered as younger, for example, than Digitalis and Antirrhinum, these again as younger than Scrophularia; Verbascum, on the contrary, is the least reduced, and therefore considered as the oldest form. Similarly the one-seeded, nut-fruited Ranunculaceæ are considered as a later type (with evident abortion) than the many-seeded, folicular forms of the Order; the Paronychieæ and Chenopodiaceæ as reduced forms of the Alsineæ type; and the occurrence of few seeds in an ovary as generally arising through reduction of the many-seeded forms. The Cyperaceæ are regarded as a form derived from the Juncaceæ through reduction, and associated with this, as is so often the case, there is a complication of the inflorescence; the Dipsacaceæ are again regarded as a form proceeding from the Valerianaceæ by a similar reduction, and these in their turn as an offshoot from the Caprifoliaceæ, etc. Of course these principles of systematic arrangement could only be applied very generally; for teaching purposes they have often required modification.”
In preparing the translation considerable difficulty has been experienced in finding a satisfactory rendering of several terms which have no exact equivalent in English. I may here especially mention the term Vorblatt (Forblad) which I have translated by the term bracteole, when it clearly applied to the first leaf (or leaves) on a pedicel; but in discussing questions of general morphology a term was much needed to include both vegetative and floral shoots, and for this I have employed the term “Fore-leaf.” Also, the term “Floral-leaf” has been adopted as an equivalent of “Hochblatt,” and the term “bract” has been limited to a leaf subtending a flower. I have followed Dr. E. L. Mark in translating the word “Anlage” by “Fundament.”
At the end of the book will be found a short appendix giving an outline of some of the earlier systems of Classification, with a more complete account of that of Hooker and Bentham.
In a book of this character it is almost impossible to avoid some errors, but it is hoped that these will be comparatively few. In correcting the proof-sheets I have received invaluable assistance from Dr. Warming and Dr. Knoblauch, who have kindly read through every sheet, and to whom I am greatly indebted for many criticisms and suggestions. I have also to thank Mr. I. H. Burkill for his kind assistance in looking over the proofs of the Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons, and Mr. Harold Wager for kindly reading through the proofs of the Algæ and Fungi. My thanks are also especially due to Mr. E. L. Danielsen, and I wish to take this opportunity of acknowledging the very considerable help which I have received from him in translating from the Original Danish.
M. C. POTTER.
January, 1895.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
BEING THE SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION ADOPTED IN THE PRESENT VOLUME.
(The Algæ and Fungi rearranged in co-operation with Dr. E. Knoblauch, the other Divisions as in the 3rd Danish Edition.)
