[Footnote 6: 115 Ga., 429.]
[Footnote 7: Mogul Steamship Company v. McGregor (L.R. 23 Q.B.D. 598).]
[Footnote 8: Bruce Wyman, "Control of the Market," p. 22. In 1914 (216 Fed. 971), a federal court granted an injunction restraining the use of fighting ships by a combination, and in 1915 (220 Fed 235), the court indicated a willingness to grant a similar injunction if necessary. Similarly "fighting brands" of goods have been recently prohibited.]
[Footnote 9: See below, sec. 15.]
[Footnote 10: Averrill v. Southern Railway (75 Fed. Rep. 736).]
[Footnote 11: 107 Minn. 145.]
[Footnote 12: Arnott v. Pittston and Elmira Coal Co., 68 N.Y. 558 (1877).]
[Footnote 13: See ch. 27, sec. 16.]
[Footnote 14: At the same time the rights of injured individuals are better safeguarded by sec. 7 of the Sherman law, permitting the recovery of threefold damages and attorney's fees.]
[Footnote 15: See ch. 28, sec. 9.]