Fig. 40. Isophotophyll of Allionia linearis, showing diphotic ecads: 1, light 1; 2, light .012; 3, light .003. × 130.
Fig. 41. Isophotophyll of Helianthus pumilus, showing isophotic ecad: 1, sun leaf; 2, shade leaf (light .012). × 130.
179. Modification of the epidermis. The development of epidermal chloroplasts in diffuse light is the only change which is due to the direct effect of light. This does not often occur in the shade ecads of sun species, but chloroplasts are regularly present in the epidermis of woodland ferns and of submerged plants. The slight development of hairs in sciophilous plants is an advantage, but it must be referred to the factors that determine water loss. The significance of epidermal papillae in increasing the absorption of light by shade plants has already been discussed. The questions as to what factor has called forth these papillae and what purpose they serve must still be regarded as unsettled. The increased size of the epidermal cells, which is a fairly constant feature of shade ecads, seems to be for the purpose of increasing translocation and transpiration, and to bear no relation to light. The extreme development of the cells of the epidermis in Streptopus and Limnorchis, which grow at the edge of mountain brooks, has been plausibly explained by E. S. Clements as a contrivance to increase water loss. The presence of a waxy coating, such as that found upon the leaves of Impatiens aurea and I. pallida, is clearly to prevent the wetting of the leaf and the consequent stoppage of the stomata. In regard to the latter, different observers have noted that the number of the stomata is greater in sun than in shade leaves. This holds generally for sun and shade species, but it is most clearly indicated by different ecads of the same species. In Scutellaria brittonii, the sun form possesses 100 stomata per square millimeter, but in the shade these are reduced to 40 per square millimeter; the sun leaf of Allionia linearis has 180 stomata to the square millimeter, the shade leaf 90. In the stable leaf of Erigeron speciosus, however, the number of stomata is the same, 180 per square millimeter, for sunlight and for diffuse light. The presence of the larger number of stomata in the plant exposed to greater loss, which at first thought seems startling, is readily explained by the more intense photosynthetic activity in the sun. Since the absorption of gases is the primary function of the stomata, and transpiration merely secondary, it is evident that sun plants must have more stomata than shade plants. This is further explained by the fact that the small air passages of sun leaves necessitate frequent inlets, which are less necessary in shade leaves with their larger air spaces. In shade plants, moreover, the decrease in the number is compensated in some measure by the ability of the epidermal cells to absorb gases directly from the air.
Fig. 42. Diphotophylls of Quercus novimexicana: 1, sun leaf; 2, shade leaf of the same tree (light .06). × 130.
180. The differentiation of the chlorenchym. The division of the chlorenchym into two tissues, sponge and palisade, is the normal consequence of the unequal illumination of the leaf surfaces. Exceptions to this rule occur only in certain monocotyledons, in which the leaf tissue consists of sponge-like cells throughout, and in those stable species that retain more or less palisade in spite of their change to diffuse light. The difference in the illumination of the two surfaces is determined by the position of the leaf. Leaves that are erect or nearly so usually have both sides about equally illuminated, and they may be termed isophotic. Leaves that stand more or less at right angles to the stem receive much more light upon the upper surface than upon the lower, and may accordingly be termed diphotic. Certain dorsiventral leaves, however, absorb practically as much light on the lower side as upon the upper. This is true of sun leaves with a dense hairy covering, which screens out the greater part of the light incident upon the upper surface. It occurs also in xerophytes which grow in light-colored sands and gravels that serve to reflect the sun’s rays upon the lower surface. In deep shade, moreover, there is no essential difference in the intensity of the light received by the two surfaces, and shade leaves are often isophotic in consequence. From these examples it is evident that isophotic and diphotic leaves occur in both sun and shade, and that the intensity of the light is secondary to direction, in so far as the modification of the leaf is concerned.
The essential connection of sponge tissue with diffuse light is conclusively shown by the behavior of shade ecads, but further evidence of great value is furnished by diphotic leaves, and those with hairy coverings. The sponge tissue, which in the shade leaf is due to the diffuse light of the habitat, is produced in the hairy leaf as a consequence of the absorption and diffraction of the light by the covering. In ordinary diphotic leaves, the absorption of light in the palisade reduces the intensity to such a degree that the cells of the lower half of the leaf are in diffuse light, and are in consequence modified to form sponge tissue. The sponge tissue of the diphotic leaf is just as clearly an adaptation to diffuse light as it is in those plants where the whole chlorenchym is in the shade of other plants or of a covering of hairs. As is indicated later, all these relations permit of ready confirmation by experiment, either by changing the position of the leaf or by modifying the intensity or direction of the light.
