Norman dependants of the lord of the manor and men of the hundred.
This being so, it is curious and important to notice that the survey of the manors of the monks of Ely was to be taken upon the oaths of the sheriff of the county, and of all the barons and of their Norman associates (eorum Francigenarum), and of the whole hundred (tocius centuriatus), the priests, præpositi, and six villani of each manor (villa).[114]
The sochmanni and liberi homines must here be included either among the 'Norman associates' or the 'whole hundred.'
It may be concluded, therefore, that the liberi homines and sochmanni were of Danish or Norman origin, as also probably was the Court Baron itself; whilst in those districts of England not so much under Danish or Norman influence, the demesne lands were not let out until a later period to permanent freeholding tenants. Upon the lord's demesne, and perhaps [p089] in the manorial hall, may have been the 'Francigenæ eorum' belonging to the 'Comitatus,' not necessarily holders of land, but more or less dependants of the lord of the manor. Out of the Danish district nearly all the population on the manor seems clearly to have been tenants in villenage or slaves.
IV. THE CLASSES OF TENANTS IN VILLENAGE.
We turn now to the tenants in villenage, who formed the bulk of the population, and with whom this inquiry has most to do.
The terms of the writ ordering the survey to be made on the Ely manors show clearly what classes of tenants in villenage were expected to be found on the manors. The jury were to inquire—
- (1) Quot villani.
- (2) Quot cotarii.
- (3) Quot servi.
The three classes of tenants in villenage actually mentioned in the Survey are almost universally the—
- (1) Villani.
- (2) Bordarii [or cottarii].
- (3) Servi.