[8] “Al Padre Fray Francisco de Sant Miguel, la provincia de los Pecos con los siete Pueblos de la Ciénega que le cae al Oriente, y todas los baqueros de aquella cordillera y comarca hasta la Sierra Nevada, y los Pueblos de la Gran Salina, ... i asi mismo los tres Pueblos grandes de Xumanas ó rrayados, llamados en su lengua, atripuy, genobey, quelotetrey, pataotrey con sus subgetos.”——Obediencia y vasallaje a Su Magestad por los Indios del Pueblo de San Juan Baptista, Doc. Ined. de Indias, op. cit., XVI, 113–114.
[9] Benavides, Memorial, 1630, in Land of Sunshine, Los Angeles, California, vol. XIV, p. 46, 1901. Vetancurt, Cronica, pp. 302–305, Mexico, reprint 1871.
[10] According to Vetancurt, op. cit., Benavides says: “They each one placed it [11] Translated in the Land of Sunshine, XV, nos. 5 and 6, Nov. and Dec., 1901. [12] Compare Bandelier, Gilded Man, p. 255, 1893, and Final Report, pt. I, 131, 132, 168, and pt. II, p. 267; also Fifth Annual Report of the Executive Committee of the Archæological Institute of America, pp. 37, 85, 1884. We must assume that the four “pueblos” occupied by the tribe in Oñate’s time (1598) had all been abandoned and that the “great pueblo of the Xumanos” mentioned by Benavides had been established after the Jumano had been induced by Salas to return from the plains. Bandelier suggests that the Piro pueblo of Tabirá was probably the village of the Jumano, but I find no evidence that the Piro and the Jumano occupied a settlement together (Bandelier, Final Report, pt., I, pp. 131, 132). Escalante (op. cit., Land of Sunshine, March, 1900, p. 248) states that on account of Apache hostilities the pueblos of Chililí, Tafique (Tajique), and Quarac of the Tehua (Tigua) Indians; and Abó, Jumancas, and Tabirá of the Tompiros, were abandoned. That “Jumancas” and the “Pueblo de los Jumanos” were one and the same there appears to be no doubt, consequently if Jumancas and Tabirá had been the same village they would hardly have been mentioned as distinct. Escalante, who wrote in 1778, gathered his information from the official archives at Santa Fé. [13] “Informe a S. M. sobre las tierras de Nuevo Mejico, Quivira y Teguayo,” in Fernandez Duro, Don Diego de Penalosa, Madrid, 1882, p. 59. Posadas was custodian of the missions of New Mexico in 1661–64, during the governorship of the notorious Don Diego de Peñalosa y Briceño, and was a missionary there for ten years previously. His Informe was written after 1678. [14] Compare Bandelier, Final Report, pt. I, 167, note, 1890; Bancroft, North Mexican States and Texas, I, 386, 1886. [15] Bandelier in Arch. Inst. Papers, Am. Series, v, 182, 183, 1890; Bancroft, Hist. Arizona and New Mexico, 237, 1889. [16] “Some Pueblo Ruins in Scott County, Kansas,” in Kansas Historical Collections, vol. 6, p. 124, Topeka, 1900. See also a comment on the article by the present writer in American Anthropologist, vol. 2, 1900, p. 778. For the location of Quivira, which, as we have seen, was beyond the Jumano settlements on the plains, see Hodge, “Coronado’s March to Quivira,” in Brower, Harahey (Memoirs of Explorations in the Basin of the Mississippi), St. Paul, 1899. [17] Letter of Fray Silvestre Velez de Escalante, April 2, 1778, translated in Land of Sunshine, Los Angeles, Cala., vol. XII, p. 314, 1900. The citation tends also to show the proximity of El Quartelejo and the “Quivira” or Wichita settlements.