thinges to-gider? And eek, at the laste, see wel that a thing
65
that is dyvers from any thing, that thilke thing nis nat that
same thing fro which it is understonden to ben dyvers. Thanne
folweth it, that thilke thing that by his nature is dyvers fro
soverein good, that that thing nis nat soverein good; but certes,
that were a felonous corsednesse to thinken that of him that
70
nothing nis more worth. For alwey, of alle thinges, the nature
of hem ne may nat ben bettre than his biginning; for which