[780] Einleitung in das A.T., pp. 690 ff.
[781] Einleitung.
[782] Untersuchungen über dis Textgestalt u. die Echtheit des Buches Micha, 1887.
[783] De Profetie van Micha, 1891, which I have not seen. It is summarised in Wildeboer's Litteratur des A.T., 1895.
[784] Introduction, 1892.
[785] Litteratur des A.T., pp. 148 ff.
[786] Wildeboer (De Profet Micha), Von Ryssel and Elhorst.
[787] Cheyne, therefore, is not correct when he says ("Introduction" to second edition of Robertson Smith's Prophets, p. xxiii.) that it is "becoming more and more doubtful whether more than two or three fragments of the heterogeneous collection of fragments in chaps. iv.-vii. can have come from that prophet."
[789] Wildeboer seems to me to have good grounds for his reply to Stade's assertion that the occurrence of promises after the threats only blunts and nullifies the latter. "These objections," says Wildeboer, "raise themselves only against the spoken, but not against the written word." See, too, the admirable remarks he quotes from De Goeje.