[Taste], Empedokles, i. [46];
Demokritus, [78].
[Taxation], direct, according to wealth, iv. [331].
[Teaching], denied in Menon, ii. [254 n.];
διδαχὴ and πειθώ, distinct, ib., iii. [172 n.];
knowledge to be elicited out of untutored mind, how far correct, ii. [249];
dialectician alone can teach, iii. [37];
idéal unrealisable, [51];
books ([q. v.]) and lectures of little use, [34];
proper use of dialectic and rhetoric, [40];
of rhetoricians, practical value of, [45];
Sokrates’ and Aristotle’s views, [53 n.];
exercises for students, [79], [80 n.], [90 n.];
parents’ jealousy towards influential teachers, ii. [265 n.]
Τεχνίτης, ii. [272 n.]
[Teleology], physiology of Timæus subordinated to ethical, iv. [257];
see [Ends].
[Temperance], σωφροσύνη, ii. [153 n.];
as treated by Plato and Aristotle, [170];
is self-knowledge, [155];
and with justice the condition of happiness and freedom, [12];
the condition of virtue and happiness, [358];
and intelligence identical, having same contrary, [279];
a kind of sedateness, objections, [154];
a variety of feeling of shame, refuted, [ ib.];
doing one’s own business, refuted, [155];
as cognition of cognition and of non-cognition, of no avail for our end, happiness, [159], [160];
not the science of good and evil, and of little service, [161];
undiscovered, but a good, [162];
Charmidês, difficulties unnoticed in Politikus, iii. [282];
in state, iv. [34-5];
distinction effaced between justice and, [135];
relation to rest of virtue, [425].
[Tennemann], i. [302].
[Thales], philosophy, i. [4];
doctrine of eclipses, [6 n.];
foretold eclipse, [4 n.];
misrepresented by Cicero, [ib.]
Θαρράλεος, ii. [145 n.]
Theætêtus, date, i. [307-10], [313], [315], [324], [325 n.], ii. [228 n.], iii. [111 n.];
purpose, [167 n.], [176];
value, [177];
great advance in analytical psychology, [164];
negative result, [ 176];
difficulties not solved in any other dialogue, [180];
sophisms in, [158 n.];
like Megarics, i. [134 n.];
method contrasted with Philêbus, iii. [335 n.];
scenery and personages, [110];
Sokrates’ mental obstetric, [112];
what is knowledge, [111];
sensible perception, ib., [113], [154], [256];
doctrine erroneously identified with Homo Mensura, [113], [118], [120 n.], [122], [162 n.];
Herakleitean flux, [114], [115], [126], [128];
Empedokles’ doctrine, [114], [115];
Plato’s exposition confused, [114];
relativity of sensible facts, [126], [154];
divergences of men, from mental and associative difference, [155];
statesman and philosopher contrasted, [183];
the genuine ruler a shepherd, iv. [10];
relativity twofold, to comparing subject, and to another object, besides the one directly described, iii. [127];
relations are nothing in the object without a comparing subject, [ ib.];
no absolute ens, [129];
arguments from dreams, &c., answered, [130];
Plato’s reference to subjective and objective, [134];
Homo Mensura, true meaning, [137], [164 n.];
its counter-proposition, [148];
Plato’s arguments against Homo Mensura, [135];
he ignores the proper qualification, [137];
the doctrine equalises all animals, [135], [292];
not true in the sense meant, [141];
the wise man alone a measure, [136];
reply, [143];
special knowledge required, where future consequences involved, [136];
but Relativity does not imply that every man believes himself to be infallible, [145];
it annuls dialectic — not true, [146];
sensible perception does not include memory, [ 157];
argument from analogy of seeing and not seeing at the same time, [ ib.];
the mind sees not with but through the eyes, [159];
the mind makes several judgments by itself, [160];
knowledge lies in the mind’s comparisons respecting sensible perceptions, [161];
difference from modern views, [162];
cognition is true opinion — objections, [168], [184 n.];
are false opinions possible, [169], [181 n.];
waxen memorial tablet in the mind, [169];
distinction of possessing, and having actually in hand, knowledge, [170];
simile of pigeon-cage, [171];
false opinion impossible or a man may know what he does not know, [170];
the confusions of cognitions and non-cognitions, refuted, [171];
for rhetors communicate true opinion, not knowledge, [172];
knowledge is true opinion plus rational explanation, [173];
analogy of elements and compounds, [ib.];
rejected, [175];
compared with Phædrus, [18];
Symposion, [ ib.];
Sophistês, [181 n.], [187], [227], [242], [258], [332];
Politikus, [185 n.], [187], [256];
Kratylus, [332];
Philêbus, [335 n.]