(2) May an argument be valid in meaning but invalid in form? Exemplify.
(3) Put a simple problem in arithmetic in syllogistic form and show that the minor premise naturally comes first.
(4) In the practice of law is there any custom analogous to giving the author the benefit of the doubt in logical argumentation?
(5) Test in detail the following arguments:
(1) “All wise presidents strive to give heed to the demands of the people, but this president has not done so.”
(2) “The existence of God is not universally believed, hence it cannot be true.”
(3) “The institution has prospered under the present régime therefore why change it?”
(4) “The man is guilty because seven out of the nine witnesses so testified.”
(5) “I know three men who cleared not less than ten thousand dollars in this business; and why cannot I do as much?”
(6) “Only members may vote and, since you are not a member, you will not be allowed to vote.” Change the exclusive in this argument in the two ways suggested in Chapter 8, [page 126]. Test the argument in both cases.