[532] Only mentioned in Not. Dign. Or. xxviii. 35, without the title Ulpia, but presumably belongs to the same series as cohorts I and II.
[533] Not included by Cichorius and only known from A. E. 1905. 54.
[534] One of these may be the Cohors Cypria mentioned in A. E. 1904. 163, and on an inscription from the Crimea, Latyschew ii. 293.
[535] See above, [p. 62], n. 6.
[536] One of these two regiments is probably referred to in Arrian, Ectaxis, 1.
[537] Not included by Cichorius. Cf. viii. 21814 a, A. E. 1906. 19.
[538] Inscriptions of the first of these cohorts (xiii. 7512, 7513) show that it was recruited in the East, as probably all were.
[539] If the emendation suggested above, on [p. 69], n. 3, be correct, we should also include a Cohors Seleuciensium.
[540] Arrian, Ectaxis, 18, mentions an Ituraean cohort which may be identical with one of these.
[541] This, at least, seems the most likely province for it to have been raised in. This regiment, not included by Cichorius, is only mentioned in the Syrian diploma for 157.