[542] It is not mentioned as miliaria, but is conjectured to have been so on the analogy of cohorts II and III.
[543] The title Ulpia is not given in these two cases, but the regiments obviously belonged to the same series and were probably also equitatae.
[544] Probably identical with the ‘Cohors Afrorum in Dacia’ mentioned in vi. 3529.
[545] Not included by Cichorius, and only mentioned in A. E. 1909. 104, an inscription dating from the end of the second century.
[546] There is no reason why these regiments should not have been raised between 40 and 70, but they do not appear on inscriptions until much later.
[547] Some of the cohorts and alae of Hispani may, of course, have been raised in Baetica.
[548] On some difficult points connected with this regiment see Cagnat, L’armée romaine d’Afrique, p. 258 (2nd edition).
[549] From the existence of three cohorts bearing the number III, we may assume two more with the number I, and two with the number II, of which as yet no evidence exists.
[550] This regiment is, however, possibly identical with the preceding.
[551] Not included by Cichorius, and only mentioned on a Greek inscription, which is probably of second-century date, I. G. R. R. iii. 56.