[205] Idem, Sect. B, pt. i, p. 26.
[206] I am aware that this view is in contravention of Dr. Herzfeld’s opinion, but I fail to discern any ground for his statement that the castrum of Qasṭal belongs to the type of the great legionary camps. ‘Die Genesis der islamischen Kunst,’ Der Islam, vol. i, p. 123.
[207] Flandin-Coste, Voyage en Perse, Plate 213 bis.
[208] Brünnow-Domaszewski, vol. ii, p. 82.
[209] Idem, vol. ii, p. 89.
[210] Idem, vol. ii, p. 65.
[211] Idem, vol. ii, p. 78.
[212] Dieulafoy, L’Acropole de Suse, p. 163.
[213] Perrot-Chipiez, vol. ii, p. 341, Gates of Balawât, and other plans, pp. 343-4.
[214] Plan of the acropolis of Khorsâbâd, Perrot-Chipiez, vol. ii, p. 326; the towers have a salience of 4 metres and are placed at intervals of 27 metres. Walls of Assur, Mitt. der D. O.-G., No. 32, p. 35, and plan of the western half of the mound, issued with that number. The towers are 4 metres wide, with a salience of 2 metres; the curtain walls vary in length from 24·55 metres to 29 metres—distances, remarks Dr. Andrae, which lie well within the limits of a bow-shot. See too Andrae, Die Festungswerke von Assur, vol. i, p. 5, where the normal proportions of Salmanassar III’s outer wall are given as follows: towers 8 metres wide, with a salience of 3 to 4 metres; curtain walls 30 metres long. Towers existed in the archaic walls (idem, p. 65), as well as great bastions standing out from 10 to 20 metres from the face of the wall (idem, p. 123).