—The first, or at least the most characteristic signs of this disease appear especially after a summer rain, or after the first fall rain. The leaves then become spotted with yellow. The following season these yellow spots appear as if fused together, and many leaves become entirely yellow, except the veins, which stand out bright green. Some leaves are invaded by the yellow from the edges, while the veins as before remain green. These yellow spots soon turn brown, the leaves dry up and curl slightly backwards and finally fall off, leaving the canes bare. During the very first appearance of the vine plague, many leaves turn brown and dry up in certain spots in the vineyard without the previous appearance of any yellow spots. The drying of the leaves proceeds either from the center of the spots, or from the margin of the leaves, destroying both the leaves and their veins. Later on in the fall a new crop of leaves appear, but these leaves are small or very small, bright green and sickly, and do not continue to develop after they have reached a certain size, different in different vines. In red varieties of grapes, the yellow spots in the leaves gradually turn red or claret colored, often resembling the most beautiful autumn leaves. In districts where the disease is common, these leaves are generally known as calico leaves on account of their peculiar markings.
The canes do not attain their regular growth, and fail to mature in the fall, or mature only in spots, the balance of the wood remaining dull green. The inner parts of the canes are, as a rule, more mature than the tips. Very often only one or two joints nearest the stem mature, and in bad cases no part of the canes mature, but at the advent of the rain turn black and die. Late in the fall the tips of the green canes turn black, dry up and snap off like glass when touched. The pith turns in the older canes dark brown, dries up prematurely and dies, while in very young canes the pith remains watery like a semi-transparent jelly.
Many vines have no mature wood when the leaves have fallen in the autumn, while others again have some. While the spotted leaves may appear all over the vineyard, the diseased canes appear on vines in spots, these spots in the vineyard growing larger year after year. A dead vine may be seen in the midst of healthy ones, while a healthy vine, on the other hand, may remain in the midst of dead ones. It takes generally several years to kill the vines, and some varieties are hardier than others. Some Muscats may succumb in one year, while some will last for three years or more. The roots remain alive and healthy longer than any other part, and, when the top of the vine has already died, it is common to see the root send up a healthy sucker, which, however, in its turn, will become diseased and die. It is likely that the vines in some districts will suffer more than in others, and in places the vines may not become seriously injured by the disease.
The berries on badly diseased vines do not develop, but shrivel up or remain sour, and in some cases dry up entirely. In others, again, they acquire a mawkish taste, lose flavor and sweetness, and make only inferior or bad raisins. These many different characteristics of the plague depend evidently on the stage of infection. They do not follow each other in any certain succession, nor do they all appear on the same vine. Some vines show one face of the disease, other vines show another, and the observer must have been previously acquainted with the disease before he can readily recognize it.
Nature and Cause.
—The cause of the vine plague is not known. No deadly fungus has so far been found on the vine, nor has any other deadly parasite been found on the diseased vines. In California the vine plague has been studied by N. B. Pierce, of the Agricultural Department at Washington. He suggested once that the disease was of bacterial nature, but has not proved his theory, his investigations not yet being finished. Mr. E. Dowlen has also been investigating this disease, and at one time thought it caused by a fungus, which, however, was proved later by Dr. H. W. Harkness to belong to the non-injurious kind. No insects of any kind prey on the vines in sufficient numbers to cause the serious symptoms of the vine plague.[7] Whatever may be the true cause of the vine plague, certain it is that it resembles in its advent and spreading such diseases in men as cholera, yellow fever or the Oriental plague. The vine plague appears to be especially promoted by warm, moist air and rain, but it is not confined to damp places, nor has it as yet been ascertained in what relation it stands to locality and climate.
[7] The most interesting and correct account of the vine plague yet published is found in an essay on “The Mysterious Vine Disease,” by Newton B. Pierce, read before the State Horticultural Convention, at Los Angeles, March, 1890, and published in California—A Journal of Rural Industry, May 10, 1890; Vol. 3, No. 18.
In California it first made its general appearance in Anaheim in Orange county, in the month of August, 1884, when vineyards of old Mission vines suddenly stopped growing, and the grapes failed to color and ripen, while many of the vines died the same year. The plague attacks in preference vines growing on poor, sandy or alkaline soil, or in vineyards underlaid with hardpan. The weak vines succumb the first of any. This is the reason why so many vineyardists doubt the existence of any particular disease, contributing the poor condition of the vineyard to anything else than the true cause.
N. B. Pierce, who has now spent a year in studying the vine plague, has found many similarities between it and the mal nero of Italy; but the descriptions of the foreign investigators are both contradictory and insufficient, and, without a personal investigation of the Italian or French vines, the identity of our vine plague with any foreign disease cannot be established. It is to be hoped that the United States Congress will make such investigations possible. At present we do not even know whether the vine plague is original in this country or whether it was imported from foreign countries. The general opinion in the first attacked district is that the disease was imported there with grapevines brought from Europe. So far I have not been able to ascertain when and by whom such vines were imported, but I am satisfied that in the course of time it will be found that foreign grapevines were imported to the vineyards where shortly afterwards this disease first appeared.