[22] B. 39, M. 24. The concluding sentences of the paragraph need not be considered.
[23] This contention is not refuted by the objection that our distinct apprehension of an individual space is always bound up with an indistinct apprehension of the spaces immediately surrounding it. For our indistinct apprehension cannot be supposed to be of the whole of the surrounding space.
[24] It is here assumed that a whole or a totality can be infinite. Cf. p. 102.
[25] For a possible objection and the answer thereto, see note, p. 70.
[26] viz. that it is a priori and a pure perception.
[27] §§ 6-11.
[28] 'External perception' can only mean perception of what is spatial.
[29] Vorhergeht.
[30] 'Formal nature to be affected by objects' is not relevant to the context.
[31] Cf. B. 42, M. 26 (a) fin., (b) second sentence.