[25] Spencer, Ind. Inst., p. 459. [↑]

[26] Bos, p. 191. [↑]

[27] Felix, II pp. 250. [↑]

[28] Mommsen, I p. 191. [↑]

[29] Letourneau, p. 491. See also Sutherland, I p. 379. [↑]

[30] Dargun, pp. 59–61. [↑]

[31] Grosse, p. 28. [↑]

[32] Hahn, Die Haustiere, pp. 388 sqq. In a recent little book (Die Entstehung der wirtschaftlichen Arbeit, 1908, p. 92), Dr. Hahn, speaking of the first edition of the present work, observes that the result of our investigations amounts to very little, the reason being that we have confined ourselves to the study of those peoples among which the cultivation of the soil is of no consequence. The mere fact, that our chapter on agricultural tribes occupies more spaces than the chapters on hunters and fishers and on pastoral tribes taken together, proves the incorrectness of Dr. Hahn’s remark. [↑]

[33] Whereas our 5 economic groups are not an ascending series, these 3 agricultural groups are. Primitive agriculture must be anterior to a more developed state of agriculture. [↑]

[34] This group is nearly identical with Dargun’s Jägerbauern; see Dargun, p. 60 note 1. [↑]