[391] “Contra Henricum regem Angliæ,” 1522. “Werke,” Weim. ed., 10, 2, p. 172 ff. “Opp. Lat. var.,” 6, p. 385 seq. The German edition published by Luther later (“Werke,” Erl. ed., 28, p. 344 ff.) is abbreviated.
[392] “Contra Henricum,” p. 220 = 445, etc.
[393] Ibid., p. 184 = 391.
[394] “Schutzschrift an den Rath in Costnitz,” in L. Hundeshagen, “Beiträge zur Kirchenverfassungsgesch.,” 1864, 1, p. 423.
[395] Röhrich, “Gesch. der Reformation im Elsass,” 1, 1855, p. 294.
[396] Barge, “Karlstadt,” 2, pp. 223, 275, 445.
[397] “Hyperaspistes,” 1, “Opp.,” ed. Basil., 9, pp. 1066, 1096. Cp. Erasmus in “Corp. ref.,” 1, p. 689.
[398] “An den grossmechtigsten ... Adel tütscher Nation,” Strasburg, 1520 (no name), Bl. K. 1.
[399] “Adversus caninas Martini Lutheri nuptias,” Coloniæ, 1530. By Luther’s “canine marriages,” the author does not refer to Luther’s union with Catherine Bora, as is usually inferred, but, according to the preface, to the numerous marriages rendered possible by Luther’s removal of the matrimonial impediments, so that it might happen that one man could marry ten times even in the lifetime of the ten women concerned. Cp. N. Paulus, “Die Dominikaner im Kampfe gegen Luther,” p. 126.
[400] N. Paulus, ibid. He refers to Luther’s “Correspondence,” 1, p. 20; 2, p. 362; 6, p. 280.