“In [Table No. 2] there is shown the rating obtained by those panels which were considered by the committee as meriting from 8 to 10, and having given the best all-round service.

Table No. 2.—Analysis of Averages. Grade of Excellence from
8 to 10
PlatePigmentAverage
34American vermilion (basic chromate of lead)10.0
41Chrome green9.8
49Lead and zinc chromate9.7
39Zinc chromate9.5
40Zinc and barium chromate9.5
51Black oxide of iron9.5
4Sublimed white lead9.0
44Prussian blue9.0
5Sublimed blue lead8.8
20Willow charcoal8.8
222Composite paint8.8
45Prussian blue8.5
111Composite formula8.5
9Orange mineral8.3
10Red lead8.3
555Composite paint8.2
12Bright red oxide of iron8.1
20001 coat zinc chromate; 1 coat iron oxide8.1
14Venetian red8.0
888Composite paint8.0

Comparison of Results. It is of interest to compare with [Table 2 of the above report], [Table 2 of the 1910 report] of Committee U of the American Society for Testing Materials. Both charts show the highly inhibitive pigments to be in the lead.

COMMITTEE U REPORT 1910

Table II.—Analysis of Averages. Grade of
Excellence from 8 to 10

(Only resistance to corrosion was considered, and only
pigments which were common to both tests are included
)

No.PigmentAverage
34American vermilion (chrome scarlet)9.8
41Chrome green (blue tone)9.7
40Zinc and barium chromate9.7
5Sublimed blue lead9.6
4Sublimed white lead9.5
49Zinc and lead chromate9.5
39Zinc chromate9.4
12Bright red oxide9.3
44Prussian blue (water stimulative)9.2
16Natural graphite9.1
9Orange mineral (American)9.0
36Medium chrome yellow9.0
2White lead (quick process)8.9
20Willow charcoal8.8
45Prussian blue (water inhibitive)8.8
1White lead (Dutch process)8.7
10Red lead8.7
7Zinc lead white8.0