£s.£
Chairman1,000
Secretary and 7 clerks18600
Accountant and 5 clerks10150
Clerk of rates and 3 clerks6300
3,505
Engineer and 5 clerks18300
7 surveyors, of surveying and drawing staff, with 6 chainmen and 9 drawing clerks21250
5 district surveyors15000
12 clerks of works22780
9 inspectors of flushing7200
22 flap and sluice keepers892 12
Bailiff, marsh-bailiff, and wallreeve1878
9,533
Office keeper, strong-room keeper, and housekeeper3500
3 messengers and 3 errand-boys2460
596
£14,634

The cost of rent, taxes, stationery, and office incidentals, is now 4440l., which makes the total yearly outlay amount to upwards of 19,000l. The annual cost of the staff in the secretary’s department is said to have been reduced from 3962l. 4s. to 3605l.; in the engineers’ department from 16,437l. 3s. to 8973l. 16s. In the general service there has been an increase from 606l. 16s. to 696l.

A deputation who waited lately upon Lord John Russell is said to have declared the expenses of the Commissioners’ office to be at the rate of from 25 to 30 per cent. on the amount of rate collected. The sum collected in the year 1850 averaged 89,341l. The cost of management in that year was 23,465l.; this, it will be seen, is 26 per cent of the gross income.

The annual statement of the receipts and expenditure under the Commission for the year 1851 has just been published, but not officially; from this it appears that in February, 1851—

£s.d.
The balance of cash in hand was5,750911
The total receipts during the year have amounted to129,00009
Making together134,750 108

The expenditure, as returned under the general head, is—

For work£95,539 193
(This item includes the cost of supervision and compensation for damages.)
The cost of surveys has been6,332 199
Management16,43092
Loans10,442 102
Contingencies2,74911
Total payments131,494 195
Balance in hand£3,355 113

As an instance of the mismanagement of the sewers work of the metropolis, it is but right that the subjoined document should be published.

I need not offer any comment on the following “Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons, dated 28th July, 1851,” except that I was told early in January, on good authority, that the matter was now worse than it was when reported as follows:—

Privy Gardens, Whitehall Yard, Scotland Yard, &c., Public Sewer.