[343]. Thus, “Immigration calls for courage and every other personal quality which makes for social progress.” Lincoln, The City of the Dinner Pail, p. 141.
[344]. See page 160.
[345]. Cf. Bailey, W. B., “The Bird of Passage,” Am. Jour. of Soc., 18:3, p. 391.
[346]. See Professor Keller’s introduction to Fairchild’s Greek Immigration.
[347]. A slight element of inaccuracy is given to these figures by the different methods of recording immigration at different periods. Rept. Imm. Com., Stat. Rev., Abs., p. 8.
[348]. War and Other Essays, p. 169.
[349]. Cf. Kidd, Benjamin, Social Evolution, p. 237; Ellis, Havelock, The Task of Social Hygiene, pp. 2–4.
[350]. De Bows’s Review, 18:698, “Sources from which Great Empires Come.” Signed L.
[351]. This point is frequently pressed by writers who adopt the standpoint of the immigrant, as for instance, Professor Steiner. Much effort is expended to establish the high character of the immigrant, his noble motives and worthy ambitions. The wealthy American on the promenade deck is contrasted unfavorably with the alien in the steerage. No criticism is to be made of this position. It is beyond doubt that there is a great deal to admire in the very humblest of our immigrants. But a most emphatic exception must be taken to the conclusion which apparently is assumed to follow this premise; namely, that therefore anything in the way of restriction is wrong. Granted that the admirable character of the immigrant is thoroughly established. This fact does not obviate the need for action, if it appears that evils arise. If the welfare of the nation is menaced; if the immigrants are not reaping the benefits for which they have sacrificed all in the old country; if the wonderful patrimony of the United States, fitted to render an enduring service to mankind, is being thoughtlessly squandered; if conditions in foreign countries are not improved; if the most remarkable population movement in history is being left to the machinations of selfishly interested parties—if any of these things are true, the fact that it is not the immigrant’s “fault” does not remove the responsibility from those upon whom it naturally rests of taking active measures to secure to humanity the greatest and most enduring benefits which such a tremendous sociological phenomenon may be made to yield. If the first step in such a conservation program is restriction, then that step must be taken.
[352]. Cf. Hall, P. F., “The Future of American Ideals,” No. Am. Rev., Jan., 1912.