[531]. Some of the other large buildings were the work of Sir Herbert Baker, who was also responsible for another dominion capital at Pretoria in South Africa. Of his rival’s intervention at New Delhi Lutyens remarked characteristically, ‘It was my Bakerloo’.
[532]. See Drysdale, G., ‘The Work of Leonard Stokes’, Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, XXXIV (1927), 163-77, and Roberts, H. V. M., ‘Leonard Aloysius Stokes’, Architectural Review, C (1946), 173-7.
[533]. The New-Zealand-born Connell’s High-and-Over in Bucks of 1927 is very superior, however, to Tait’s Le Chateau at Silverend in Essex, and a year earlier.
CHAPTER 25 - Notes
[534]. No sharp distinction has been made in this book between architects and engineers. Such engineers, from Telford to Candela, as have been responsible for work of architectural pretension deserve to be considered as architects, and monographic works on several of them will be found in the Bibliography.
[535]. See San Francisco Museum of Art, Domestic Architecture of the San Francisco Bay Region, San Francisco, 1949.
[536]. See Banham, P. R., ‘New Brutalism’, Architectural Review, CXVIII (1955), 355-61. See also Banham’s articles in the Architectural Review on ‘Neo-Liberty’, a term introduced by Paolo Portoghesi.
[537]. Consideration of such topics of current controversial interest more properly belongs in periodicals or special critical works than in a general history, but see the [Epilogue].
[538]. There is something symptomatic in the fact that the younger men, whether architects or critical writers, are mostly content to revive early controversial attitudes of the preceding half century rather than to offer anything really new. (See [Epilogue].)