1. Method.
  2. Location.
  3. Shape and size.

The resolution of these questions depends upon the:—

a.Degree of dip of the deposit.
b.Output of ore to be provided for.
c.Depth at which the deposit is to be attacked.
d.Boundaries of the property.
e.Surface topography.
f.Cost.
g.Operating efficiency.
h.Prospects of the mine.
Fig. 2.—Showing arrangement of the bend in combined shafts.

From the point of view of entrance, the coöperation of a majority of these factors permits the division of mines into certain broad classes. The type of works demanded for moderate depths (say vertically 2,500 to 3,000 feet) is very different from that required for great depths. To reach great depths, the size of shafts must greatly expand, to provide for extended ventilation, pumping, and winding necessities. Moreover inclined shafts of a degree of flatness possible for moderate depths become too long to be used economically from the surface. The vast majority of metal-mining shafts fall into the first class, those of moderate depths. Yet, as time goes on and ore-deposits are exhausted to lower planes, problems of depth will become more common. One thing, however, cannot be too much emphasized, especially on mines to be worked from the outcrop, and that is, that no engineer is warranted, owing to the speculation incidental to extension in depth, in initiating early in the mine's career shafts of such size or equipment as would be available for great depths. Moreover, the proper location of a shaft so as to work economically extension of the ore-bodies is a matter of no certainty, and therefore shafts of speculative mines are tentative in any event.

Another line of division from an engineering view is brought about by a combination of three of the factors mentioned. This is the classification into "outcrop" and "deep-level" mines. The former are those founded upon ore-deposits to be worked from or close to the surface. The latter are mines based upon the extension in depth of ore-bodies from outcrop mines. Such projects are not so common in America, where the law in most districts gives the outcrop owner the right to follow ore beyond his side-lines, as in countries where the boundaries are vertical on all sides. They do, however, arise not alone in the few American sections where the side-lines are vertical boundaries, but in other parts owing to the pitch of ore-bodies through the end lines (Fig. 3). More especially do such problems arise in America in effect, where the ingress questions have to be revised for mines worked out in the upper levels (Fig. 7).

Fig. 3.—Longitudinal section showing "deep level" project arising from dip of ore-body through end-line.

If from a standpoint of entrance questions, mines are first classified into those whose works are contemplated for moderate depths, and those in which work is contemplated for great depth, further clarity in discussion can be gained by subdivision into the possible cases arising out of the factors of location, dip, topography, and boundaries.

MINES OF MODERATE DEPTHS.

Case I.Deposits where topographic conditions permit the alternatives of shaft or tunnel.
Case II.Vertical or horizontal deposits, the only practical means of attaining which is by a vertical shaft.
Case III.Inclined deposits to be worked from near the surface. There are in such instances the alternatives of either a vertical or an inclined shaft.
Case IV.Inclined deposits which must be attacked in depth, that is, deep-level projects. There are the alternatives of a compound shaft or of a vertical shaft, and in some cases of an incline from the surface.