[IV-35] By calling them distinct persons it is not necessarily implied that the first Quetzalcoatl ever had a real existence.
[IV-36] Veytia, Hist. Ant. Mej., tom. i., pp. 171-2.
[IV-37] Probably, as has been said, the same as Huetzin and Texcaltepocatl.
[IV-38] 875. Clavigero. 927. Veytia. 770 or 716. Ixtlilxochitl.
[IV-39] 'Los que de esta ciudad (Tollan) huyeron, edificaron otra muy próspera que se llama Cholulla.' Sahagun, Hist. Gen., tom. ii., lib. viii., p. 207.
[IV-40] See references already given on Quetzalcoatl, and also Brasseur de Bourbourg, Hist. Nat. Civ., tom. i., p. 265, et seq.
[IV-41] This king is called Mitl and Tlacomihua by Veytia and the rest. Dates: 927. Clavigero. Veytia, tom. i., p. 252, has 779, which may be a misprint for 979. 822 or 768. Ixtlilxochitl. Huemac's expedition eastward, and the crowning of Nauhyotl, or Nauhyotzin, during his absence is recorded by Torquemada, Monarq. Ind., tom. i., p. 254, and Gomara, Conq. Mex., fol. 301, as quoted in [note 30] of this chapter.
[IV-42] Respecting Tezcatlipoca, fables respecting his life on earth, and his worship as a god, see [vol. iii., pp. 199-248].
[IV-43] See [vol. ii., pp. 141-2].
[IV-44] Brasseur, Hist. Nat. Civ., tom. i., p. 322, says that Ixtlilxochitl in one place calls this king Nauhyotl. Although I have been unable to find this statement in the works of the writer mentioned, yet there can be little doubt of the two kings' identity.