[178] Prof. Fortunat Strowski, Histoire du sentiment religieux en France au 17e siècle, Ptie i, De Montaigne à Pascal, 1907, pp. 19–23. [↑]
[179] “Du Vair ne songe pas au Médiateur; s’il y a dans son traité des allusions à Notre Seigneur, le nom de Jésus-Christ ne s’y trouve, je crois bien, pas une fois. Il songe encore moins aux pieux adjuvants qui excitent l’imagination; pas un mot de l’invocation des saints, pas un mot des sacrements” (Strowski, as cited, p. 78). [↑]
[180] Cp. Prof. Thorold Rogers, Economic Interpretation of History, p. 83. [↑]
[181] In 1387 the Lollards were denounced under that name by the Bishop of Worcester as “eternally damned sons of Antichrist.” [↑]
[182] See the Repressor, Babington’s ed. in the Rolls Series, 1860, Part ii. [↑]
[183] Hook, Lives of the Archbishops (Life of Bourchier), 1867, v, 294–306. [↑]
[184] He repels, e.g., Wiclif’s argument that a priest’s misconduct sufficed to destroy his right to his endowments. Repressor, Babington’s ed. as cited, ii, 413. [↑]
[185] Hook, as cited, v, 309. [↑]
[186] Gardiner, Student’s History, p. 330. Cp. Green, ch. vi, § i, 2, pp. 267, 275; Stubbs Const. Hist., iii, 631–33. [↑]