The problem of correcting a very wide-angled objective has thus been reduced by the homogeneous oil-immersion system, both in theory and practice.[23]
Abbe’s Test-plate.
Abbe designed the test-plate ([Fig. 120]) for testing the spherical and chromatic aberrations of objectives, and estimating the thickness of cover-glasses corresponding to the most perfect correction: six glasses, having the exact thickness marked on each, 0·09 to 0·24 mm., cemented in succession on a slip, their lower surface silvered and engraved with parallel lines, the contours of which form the test. These being coarsely ruled are easily resolved by the lowest powers; yet, from the extreme thinness of the silver, they form also a delicate test for objectives of the highest power and widest aperture. The test-plate in its original size is seen in [Fig. 120], with one of the circles enlarged.
Fig. 120.—Abbe’s Test-plate for estimating thickness of glass-covers.
To examine an objective of large aperture, the discs must be focussed in succession, observing in each case the quality of the image in the centre of the field, and the variation produced by using, alternately, central and very oblique illumination.
When the objective is perfectly corrected for spherical aberration, the outlines of the lines in the centre of the field will be perfectly sharp by oblique illumination, and without any nebulous doubling or indistinctness of the edges. If, after exactly adjusting the objective for oblique light, central illumination is used, no alteration of the focus should be necessary to show the outlines with equal sharpness.
If an objective fulfils these conditions with any one of the discs, it is free from spherical aberration when used with cover-glasses of that thickness. On the other hand, if every disc shows nebulous doubling, or an indistinct appearance of the edges of the line with oblique illumination, or, if the objective requires a different focal adjustment to get equal sharpness with central as with oblique light, the spherical correction of the objective is more or less imperfect.
Nebulous doubling with oblique illumination indicates over-correction of the marginal zone; indistinctness of the edges without marked nebulosity indicates under-correction of the zone; an alteration of the focus for oblique and central illumination points to an absence of concurrent action of the separate zones, which may be due to either an average under or over correction, or to irregularity in the convergence of the rays.
