With the homogeneous oil-immersion objective it is highly necessary to utilise all marginal pencils of light, to optically unite the upper lens of the condenser with the preparation as well as the front lens of the objective by means of a liquid having the same index of refraction or at least equal to that of the immersion. Cedar Oil has been generally adopted for the purpose mentioned, the better way of using which is as follows: place a drop on the centre of the front objective, or on the top of the cover-glass, and then lower the objective by means of the coarse adjustment until it comes in contact with the oil, and carefully bring into focus by the fine adjustment. If the slide is held between the finger and thumb of one hand and moved from side to side, while the other hand is working the fine adjustment, there can be no danger of injuring either the objective or the specimen. Before putting the microscope away, take a fine camel-hair brush dipped in ether, alcohol, or methylated spirit, and carefully remove the oil from the objective and the glass cover of the object; a soft chamois leather or cambric pocket handkerchief will dry it off, or a piece of fine white blotting paper answers equally well. Should the lens come accidentally into contact with the Canada balsam, it must be very carefully removed either by ether or alcohol. The former is by far the safest, as alcohol, if not very carefully used, quickly dissolves out the balsam and loosens the cover-glass of the object.
Achromatic Condensers.
The Achromatic Condenser can no longer be classed among the accessories of the microscope, since it is an absolutely indispensable part of its optical arrangements. Its value, then, cannot be overrated, and the corrections of the lenses which enter into the construction of the condenser should be made as perfect as they can be made—in fact, as nearly approaching that of the objective as it is possible to make them. It may therefore be of interest to know something of the rise and progress of the achromatic condenser. In my first chapter I have noticed the earlier attempts made by Dr. Wollaston, whose experiments led him to fit to the underside of the stage of his microscope a short tube, in which a plano-convex lens of about three-quarters of an inch focal length was made to slide up and down (afterwards moved up and down by two knobs); to improve definition he placed a stop between the mirror and the lens. The stop was found to act better when placed between the lens and the object. From this improvement Dr. Wollaston enunciated that “the intensity of illumination will depend upon the diameter of the illuminating lens and the proportion of the image to the perforation, and may be regulated according to the wish of the observer.” Dujardin in France and Tully in England were at work in the same direction. The former a year or two later on contrived an instrument, which he termed an eclairage, to remedy the defects of Wollaston’s, and for illuminating objects with achromatic light. This was submitted for approval to Sir David Brewster, who, when the use of the achromatic condenser was first broached, used these encouraging words:—“I have no hesitation in saying that the apparatus for illumination requires to be as perfect as the apparatus for vision, and on this account I would recommend that the illuminating lens should be perfectly free from chromatic and spherical aberration, and that the greatest care be taken to exclude all extraneous light both from the object and eye of the observer.” This far-seeing observer in optical science has borne good fruit, and the outcome of his views is seen in the great development and improvement of the achromatic condenser. In 1839 Andrew Ross made his first useful form of condenser, and gave rules for the illumination of objects in an article written for the “Penny Cyclopædia.” These, epitomised, read as follows: 1. That the illuminating cone should equal the aperture of the objective, and no more. 2. With daylight, a white cloud being in focus, the object has to be placed nearly at the apex of the cone. The object is seen better sometimes above and sometimes below the apex of the cone. 3. With lamplight a bull’s-eye lens is to be used, to parallelise the rays, so that they may be similar to those coming from the white cloud. It has been seen that Mr. Lister foreshadowed the sub-stage condenser.
The early form of Ross’s condenser consists of two small brass tubes made to slide one in the other. To the outer one is attached a flat brass plate which slides underneath the stage of the microscope, and by means of a screw the adjustment of the axis of the illuminator is effected. The upper portion of the apparatus carries the achromatic combination, which by a rack and pinion movement is brought nearer to, or removed further from the object on the stage. The several parts of the illuminator unscrew, so that the lenses may be used either combined for high powers, or separated for low powers.
Fig. 126.—Original form of Gillett’s Achromatic Condenser.
Messrs. Smith & Beck greatly improved upon Ross’s condenser by adding another achromatic lens to the combination, three being employed when used with high-power objectives and two or even one with the lower, the adjustment and focussing being made by rack and pinion arrangement beneath the stage. Some further changes for the better were made in the condenser by Powell, and in 1850 an amateur microscopist, Mr. Gillett, fully grasping the value of controlling the cone of rays passing into the microscope, devised a new form of condenser, in connection with which a revolving series of diaphragms of different values were made to pass between the achromatic lenses and the source of light.
Andrew Ross constructed the first condenser on Gillett’s principle, and this proved to be one of the most successful pieces of apparatus contrived. Gillett’s Condenser consists of an achromatic lens c, about equal to an object-glass of one quarter of an inch focal length, with an aperture of 80°. This lens is screwed into the top of a brass tube, and intersecting which, at an angle of about 25°, is a circular rotating brass plate a b, provided with a conical diaphragm, having a series of circular apertures of different sizes h g, each of which in succession, as the diaphragm is rotated, proportionally limits the light transmitted through the illuminating lens. The circular plate in which the conical diaphragm is fixed is provided with a spring and catch e f, the latter indicating when an aperture is central with the illuminating lens, also the number of the aperture as marked on the graduated circular plate. Three of these apertures have central discs for circularly oblique illumination, allowing only the passage of a hollow cone of light to illuminate the object. The illuminator above described is placed in the secondary stage i i, which is situated below the general stage of the microscope, and consists of a cylindrical tube having a rotatory motion, also a rectangular adjustment, which is effected by means of two screws l m, one in front, and the other on the left side of its frame. This tube receives and supports all the various illuminating and polarising apparatus, and other auxiliaries.
Directions for using Gillett’s Condenser.—In the adjustment of the compound body of the microscope for using with Gillett’s illuminator, one or two important points should be observed—first, centricity; and secondly, the fittest compensation of the light to be employed. With regard to the first, place the illuminator in the cylindrical tube, and press upwards the sliding bar k in its place, until checked by the stop; move the microscope body either vertically or inclined for convenient use; and, with the rack and pinion which regulates the sliding bar, bring the illuminating lens to a level with the upper surface of the object-stage; then move the arm which holds the microscope body to the right, until it meets the stop, whereby its central position is attained; adjust the reflecting mirror so as to throw light up the illuminator, and place upon the mirror a piece of clean white paper to obtain a uniform disc of light. Then put on the low eye-piece, and a low power (the half-inch), as more convenient for the mere adjustment of the instrument; place a transparent object on the stage, adjust the microscope-tube, until vision is obtained of the object; then remove the object, and take off the cap of the eye-piece, and in its place fix on the eye-glass called the “centring eye-glass,”[26] which will be found greatly to facilitate the adjustment now under consideration, namely, the centring of the compound body of the microscope with the illuminating apparatus of whatever description. The centring-glass, being thus affixed to the top of the eye-piece, is adjusted by its sliding-tube (without disturbing the microscope-tube) until the images of the diaphragms in the object-glass and centring lens are distinctly seen. The illuminator should now be moved by means of the left-hand screw on the secondary stage while looking through the microscope, to enable the observer to recognize the diaphragm belonging to the illuminator, and by means of the two adjusting screws to place this diaphragm central with the others: thus the first condition, that of centricity, will be accomplished. Remove the white paper from the mirror, and also the centring-glass, and replace the cap on the eye-piece, also the object on the stage, of which distinct vision should then be obtained by the rack and pinion, or fine screw adjustment, should it have become deranged.
