All the railway organizations described above make a distinction between death and disability insurance, and sick and accident insurance. The local unions have been prohibited either specifically or by implication from maintaining any association or society for paying death and disability benefits. This rule was first established by the Conductors. During the early years of the Conductors' national organization, 1868-1880, many subordinate divisions maintained mutual benefit associations for the payment of death and disability insurance. The growth of the national benefit department was thus retarded, and at the tenth annual session in October, 1877, subordinate divisions were prohibited from maintaining "mutual benefit societies."[[36]] The national organizations, on the other hand, do not furnish accident insurance, but leave this function to the local bodies. In the formation of this policy, also, the Conductors took the initiative by providing in their first national constitution in December, 1868, that the order should never become a weekly benefit association.[[37]] The Engineers had a similar provision as early as September, 1869; but national regulations governing the payment of weekly benefits were nevertheless formulated. The other unions have followed this policy, and their constitutions provide that the weekly benefits shall be levied, collected, and distributed according to national rules.

The most striking characteristic of the insurance features of these organizations has been the combination of disability and death insurance. The fact that railway employees are specially exposed to the risks of disabling accidents has been the chief influence in this direction. The large number of claims paid for disability in the Conductors', the Firemen's, and the Trainmen's beneficiary departments during recent years shows the high importance of disability insurance to the men engaged in the more hazardous occupations. The disability claims paid among the Firemen for the eleven years from 1894 to 1904 were 24.5 per cent. of the total number of claims paid, or about one third of the number of death claims paid. Among the Conductors the disability claims, paid during the same period, amounted to one seventh of the death claims paid. The disability claims paid by the Trainmen during twenty years, 1884-1904, were 32.5 per cent. of all claims paid.

The proportion of disability to death claims has decreased in each of these organizations in recent years. The disability claims paid by the Conductors in 1894 were 15.6 per cent. of the total number, and at the close of 1904, 11.8 per cent.; while among the Firemen the percentages for the biennial terms 1894-1896 and 1902-1904 were 32.9 per cent. and 21.4 per cent., respectively. The claim statistics of the Trainmen show the same tendency although there are great variations from year to year. In 1890, 1895 and 1897 the percentage of disability claims rose to 40, 41 and 40, respectively, while in 1888, 1900 and 1903 the percentage fell to 28, 29 and 27, respectively.

DEATH AND DISABILITY CLAIMS.
Name of Organization. Term. Claims Paid. Per Cent. of Disability Claims. Disability Claims per 1000 of Total Membership.
Death. Disability.
Conductors 1893-1894 265 49 15.6 3.8
1895-1896 274 46 14.3 3.1
1897-1898 363 63 14.8 3.6
1899-1900 440 55 11.1 2.6
1901-1902 523 81 13.4 3.2
1903-1904 688 92 11.8 3
Firemen 1894-1896 295 145 32.9 6
1896-1898 349 118 25.3 4.3
1898-1900 488 174 26.3 4.7
1900-1002 655 186 22.1 3.9
1902-1904 857 234 21.4 4.3
Trainmen[[38]] 1886 75 37 33 4.6
1887 77 42 35 4.8
1888 145 59 28 5.2
1889 152 69 31 5.1
1890 175 116 40 8.6
1891 264 123 32 6.6
1892 270 145 34 6.1
1893 372 201 35 7.1
1894 304 138 31 6.1
1895 212 147 41 7.8
1896 254 159 38 7.2
1897 240 160 40 6.3
1898 358 165 31 5.8
1899 403 211 34 5.7
1900 498 205 29 4.9
1901 507 231 31 5.1
1902 570 249 30 4.7
1903 788 305 27 4.6
1904 849 374 31 5.2

The decrease in the ratio of disability to death claims paid is due primarily to a stricter definition of disability and to better administration. The number of disability claims paid per 1000 of membership shows also, however, a slight decrease.

The records of the Trainmen which separate claims resulting from accidents still farther emphasize the need for disability insurance.

DEATH AND DISABILITY CLAIMS IN BROTHERHOOD OF TRAINMEN (1886-1904).
Kind of Claims Number from Natural causes Number from Accidental Causes Percentage of Claims from Natural Causes. Percentage of Claims from Accidental Causes. Percentage of Claims from all Causes.
Disability. 526 2,610 16.77 83.23 32-1/3
Death. 2,033 4,522 31. 69. 67-2/3
Total 2,559 7,322 26-1/3 73-2/3 100

The data show the place disability insurance has occupied among the Railway Trainmen during twenty years. For this period disability claims for all causes were 32-1/3 per cent. of all claims paid. The percentage of claims from accidental causes—including both disability and death—was 73-2/3 of the whole number of claims paid, while the percentage from natural causes was only 26-1/2. In other words, these statistics show that the Trainmen's accidental disability and death claims, as compared with those due to natural causes, have averaged almost three claims paid as the result of accidental causes to one as the result of natural causes.

[[39]]