The Theory Illustrated, with a View of the
Summits of the Alps.

There are two different directions in which we may observe the destruction of our land to proceed; in the one of these, the basis of our continent is diminished by the incroachment of the sea; in the other, again, it is the height of the land above the level of the sea that is lowered. We have been considering the incroachment of the sea upon the continent; let us now examine how far there may also appear sufficient documents, by which we may be led to conclude a long progress in time past, for the destruction of the solid mass of earth above the sea, without diminishing its basis.

If we shall suppose this earth composed of horizontal strata, and of one level surface, without the least protuberance remaining by which we might be informed of what had been removed by time in the operation of second causes, we should be ignorant of every thing of cosmogeny but this, That the strata of the globe had been originally formed (by the sea) in the same shape as we had found them on the surface of the land. But this is not the shape of the surface of our continent: We have every where abundance of eminences, sufficient to give us great information with regard to what had passed in former periods of time, if the strata of the globe were in that regular shape which they had originally assumed in being deposited at the bottom the sea.

The strata, however, are not in that regular shape and position from whence we might learn, by examining the remaining portions, what had been carried away from the surface in general; they are found variously inclined to the horizon; and this we find both occasioned from the fracture and flexure of those bodies, thus changed from their natural horizontal state. Thus, though there are in many places immense masses of strata cut off abruptly, and exposed to view, without the remainder appearing, we cannot from hence form any estimate of the general quantity of destruction; at the same time, it must be evident, from a general inspection, that there has been an immense quantity removed; and that an immense time had been required in bringing about those revolutions of things, which are not done by violent changes, but by slow degrees.

Besides that general conclusion with regard to the destruction of the strata, there is also in many places a demonstration of that fact, from a measured minimum of the quantity which had been removed. It is to the mining business chiefly that we are indebted for that demonstration of which we now shall give an example.

The coal strata, about Newcastle upon Tyne, dip to the south-east at the rate of one in twelve, or thereabouts. This is but little removed from the horizontal position; at the same time, the strata come all up to the soil or surface in a country which is level, or with little risings. But in those strata there is a slip, or hitch, which runs from north-east to south-west, for 17 or 18 miles in a straight line; the surface on each side of this line is perfectly equal, and nothing distinguishable in the soil above; but, in sinking mines, the same strata are found at the distance of 70 fathoms from each other. Here therefore is a demonstration, that there had been worn away, and removed into the sea, 70 fathoms more from the country on the one side of this line, than from that on the other. It is far from having given us all the height of country which has been washed away, but it gives us a minimum of that quantity.

The examination of what is commonly called a secondary country is not sufficient to give us an idea of the immense operation of time in wearing the surface of this earth. It is not that those countries of inferior hardness and elevation have been spared in the course of time, but because we have not, in those levelled countries, such great remainders, by which we are to judge the quantity of what is lost. In the alpine country, again, though it be the same system of things with that which takes place in the lower country, the revolution of things is more marked for our view; and the ravages of time, in destroying the solid parts of the globe, in order to make soil of that which is removed, may be seen in all the steps of that important operation; whereas, in the more level countries, the scale of elevation is imperceptible, and that of time is so slow as renders our examination fruitless. It is the Alps, therefore, chiefly that we are to take for an example, in tracing this operation of nature upon the surface of this earth, and forming some idea of the course of time that must have flowed during that operation in which the height of our land had been diminished.

On whatever side we approach the Alps, we find some great river discharging the waters which had been gathered above, and with that water all the waste of earth and stone which had been made among those lofty masses of decaying rock. Now, we find this river running in a valley proportioned, in general, to this vehicle, in which is travelled the wreck of ruinous mountains. Spacious plains attend those mighty streams; and, tho' sometimes we find the greatest rivers much confined between approaching hills of solid rock, the valley opens again, and, on the whole, is always corresponding to the current of water which has successively run in all the quarters of this plain. Here a question occurs; Has this valley been made by the operation of the river itself, or has it been the effect of other causes? Let us now resolve that question.

If the valley was made for the river by any other natural cause, either we should tell by what means this work had been performed, or all reasoning upon the subject is at an end, and fancy substituted in its place. If again the river be considered as the means employed by nature in making this valley, then all the solid parts between the bounding mountains must have been removed, and the fertile plains must have been formed by the water depositing those materials which we find in the soil, and which had come originally from the solid mountains. There is no occasion to enter into any argument to prove this fact; nobody that examines the matter will find any reason to doubt; and it would be as unreasonable for those to doubt who have not examined, as for those who find no reasonable subject of doubt to disbelieve.

We are now to suppose the great river to have formed the valley and extensive plain in which the water runs,—a valley corresponding to the grandeur of the river by which it has been formed. But, as we ascend this great valley, we find other valleys branching from this main valley; and, in all those subordinate valleys, we find rivers corresponding in like manner with the magnitude of the valley. Here, therefore, is infinitely more than a single river, and a valley corresponding to the river; here is a system of rivers and of valleys, things calculated in perfect wisdom, or properly adapted to each other.