[742]. It is a good illustration of the defective character of our tradition (Introd. [§ XIII].) that this was quite unknown till the publication of the extracts from Menon’s Iatrika contained in the Anonymus Londinensis. The extract referring to Philolaos is given and discussed by Diels in Hermes, xxviii. pp. 417 sqq.
[743]. Hermes, loc. cit.
[744]. Plato, Phileb. 16 c sqq.
[745]. Diog. iii. 37. For similar charges, cf. Zeller, Plato, p. 429, n. 7.
[746]. Iambl. V. Pyth. 199. Diels is clearly right in ascribing the story to Aristoxenos (Arch. iii. p. 461, n. 26).
[747]. Timon ap. Gell. iii. 17 (R. P. 60 a).
[748]. For Hermippos and Satyros, see Diog. iii. 9; viii. 84, 85.
[749]. So Iambl. in Nicom. p. 105, 11; Proclus, in Tim. p. 1, Diehl.
[750]. Diels, Vors. p. 269.
[751]. They are τὰ θρυλούμενα τρία βιβλία (Iambl. V. Pyth. 199), τὰ διαβόητα τρία βιβλία (Diog. viii. 15).