[57] 5th Report Hist. MSS., i. 452.
[58] The italics are mine.
[59] Compare Dr. Sheppard’s remarks in 5th Report Hist. MSS., i. 452 a. It would take us too far afield to undertake the distinct task of reconciling the clause in A.I (Ibid.) with Lanfranc’s letter to the pope, which implies, as Mr. Freeman observes, that there was but one hearing, namely, that at Winchester (Norm. Conq., iv. 358). The clause in A.I asserts an adjournment of the hearing at Easter (Winchester), and a decision of the case at Whitsuntide (Windsor).
[60] I need not print the list, as it will be found in the ‘Monasticon,’ and in Kempe’s ‘Historical Notices of St. Martin’s le Grand,’ as well as in Mr. Stevenson’s paper.
[61] E. H. R., xii. 109 note.
[62] Norm. Conq., vol. iv., App. C.
[63] See ‘Geoffrey de Mandeville,’ p. 435. I do not guarantee the derivation.
[64] Mon. Ang., ii. 302.
[65] He is also clearly the “Eustachius de Huntedune” mentioned under Stamford (D. B. 336 b).
[66] Norman Conquest, vol. ii.