Fig. 198.
“In the diagram, [Fig. 196], we have shown a part of an ellipse whose length is 10 inches and breadth 6, the figure being half size. In order to give an idea of the actual appearance of the combination when complete, we show in [Fig. 198] the pair in gear, on a scale of 3 inches to the foot. The excessive eccentricity was selected merely for the purpose of illustration. [Fig. 198] will serve also to call attention to another serious circumstance, which is that although the ellipses are alike, the wheels are not; nor can they be made so if there be an even number of teeth, for the obvious reason that a tooth upon one wheel must fit into a space on the other; and since in the first wheel, [Fig. 196], we chose to place a tooth at the extremity of each axis, we must in the second one place there a space instead; because at one time the major axes must coincide, at another the minor axis, as in [Fig. 191]. If then we use even numbers, the distribution and even the forms of the teeth are not the same in the two wheels of the pair. But this complication may be avoided by using an odd number of teeth, since, placing a tooth at one extremity of the major axis, a space will come at the other.
Fig. 199.
“It is not, however, always necessary to cut teeth all round these wheels, as will be seen by an examination of [Fig. 199], c and d being the fixed centres of the two ellipses in contact at p. Now p must be on the line c d, whence, considering the free foci, we see p b is equal to p c, and p a to p d; and the common tangent at p makes equal angles with c p and p a, as is also with p b and p d; therefore, c d being a straight line, a b is also a straight line and equal to c d. If then the wheels be overhung, that is, fixed on the ends of the shafts outside the bearings, leaving the outer faces free, the moving foci may be connected by a rigid link a b, as shown.
“This link will then communicate the same motion that would result from the use of the complete elliptical wheels, and we may therefore dispense with most of the teeth, retaining only those near the extremities of the major axes which are necessary in order to assist and control the motion of the link at and near the dead-points. The arc of the pitch-curves through which the teeth must extend will vary with their eccentricity: but in many cases it would not be greater than that which in the approximation may be struck about one centre, so that, in fact, it would not be necessary to go through the process of rectifying and subdividing the quarter of the ellipse at all, as in this case it can make no possible difference whether the spacing adopted for the teeth to be cut would “come out even” or not if carried around the curve. By this expedient, then, we may save not only the trouble of drawing, but a great deal of labor in making, the teeth round the whole ellipse. We might even omit the intermediate portions of the pitch ellipses themselves; but as they move in rolling contact their retention can do no harm, and in one part of the movement will be beneficial, as they will do part of the work; for if, when turning, as shown by the arrows, we consider the wheel whose axis is d as the driver, it will be noted that its radius of contact, c p, is on the increase; and so long as this is the case the other wheel will be compelled to move by contact of the pitch lines, although the link be omitted. And even if teeth be cut all round the wheels, this link is a comparatively inexpensive and a useful addition to the combination, especially if the eccentricity be considerable. Of course the wheels shown in [Fig. 198] might also have been made alike, by placing a tooth at one end of the major axis and a space at the other, as above suggested. In regard to the variation in the velocity ratio, it will be seen, by reference to [Fig. 199], that if d be the axis of the driver, the follower will in the position there shown move faster, the ratio of the angular velocities being pd/pb; if the driver turn uniformly the velocity of the follower will diminish, until at the end of half a revolution, the velocity ratio will be pb/pd; in the other half of the revolution these changes will occur in a reverse order. But p d = l b; if then the centres b d are given in position, we know l p, the major axis; and in order to produce any assumed maximum or minimum velocity ratio, we have only to divide l p into segments whose ratio is equal to that assumed value, which will give the foci of the ellipse, whence the minor axis may be found and the curve described. For instance, in [Fig. 198] the velocity ratio being nine to one at the maximum, the major axis is divided into two parts, of which one is nine times as long as the other; in [Fig. 199] the ratio is as one to three, so that, the major axis being divided into four parts, the distance a c between the foci is equal to two of them, and the distance of either focus from the nearer extremity of the major axis equal to one, and from the more remote extremity equal to three of these parts.”
