3. xm′1 † y′1m′0xy1 [Fig. II.] Concl. right.

[pg149] 4. x1m′0 † ym0x1y0 [Fig. I (α).] Concl. right.

5. m′x′1 † m′y0x′y′1 [Fig. II.] Concl. right.

6. x′m0 † y1m0 Fallacy of Like Eliminands not asserted to exist.

7. m′x′1 † y′1m0 Fallacy of Unlike Eliminands with an Entity-Premiss.

8. m′x′0 † y′1m0y′1x′0 [Fig. I (α).] Concl. right.

9. mx′1 † my0x′y′1 [Fig. II.] Concl. right.

10. m′1x0 † m′1y′0x′y1 [Fig. III.] Concl. right.

11. x1m0 † ym1x′y1 [Fig. II.] Concl. right.

12. xm0 † m′y′0xy′0 [Fig. I.] Concl. right.