[1189] Maass, p. 512.
[1190] Feist, p. 262.
[1191] With this section compare my Entstehung etc., where a fuller discussion and authorities are given.
[1192] [Above, pp. 33 ff]., [46 f]., [72 f]., [110 ff].
[1193] ἠλιτόμηνος, Il. XIX, 118.
[1194] [Above, pp. 313] and [167].
[1195] Fotheringham in his interesting paper on Cleostratus (Journ. of Hell. Studies, 39, 1919, 177) tries to explain this alternation by the intercalation; if a month was intercalated the games would be transferred from Parthenios to Apollonios. This is in my opinion impossible. The Greek feasts were bound up with the months, which were named from some of them; this association prevented a feast from being transferred to a month with another name, i. e. the feast was fixed with reference to the name of the month, not to its number.
[1196] Axel W. Persson, Die Exegeten und Delphi, Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, vol. 14, 1918, Nr. 22.
[1197] [Above, p. 330]. My statement in Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 14, 1911, pp. 435 and 448 n. 1, is to be tested by this. It agrees exactly.
[1198] See my Griechische Feste, p. 397.